Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Dade County
| Decision Date | 16 July 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-2648,84-2648 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1740 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida d/b/a Miami Aviation Authority, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson & Kniskern, Miami, and B. Richard Young, for appellant.
Richard R. McCormack, Miami, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
The final order awarding attorney's fees on a contractual indemnity theory is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings upon a holding that: (a) the subject contract of indemnity must be construed to allow an award of attorney's fees for the claimant Dade County in defending the prior action herein unless the fees were incurred in defending a claim based on its own negligence, Charles Poe Masonry, Inc. v. Spring Lock Scaffolding Rental Equipment Co., 374 So.2d 487, 489 (Fla.1979); University Plaza Shopping Center v. Stewart, 272 So.2d 507, 511 (Fla.1973); O'Connell v. Walt Disney World Co., 413 So.2d 444, 447 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Jones v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 407 So.2d 1032, 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), pet. for review denied, 417 So.2d 329 (Fla.1982); Leadership Housing Systems of Florida v. T & S Electric, 384 So.2d 733, 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), (b) no evidence or stipulation of facts was adduced below on Dade County's claim for indemnity and therefore no proofs were presented to bring the said claim within the terms of the subject indemnity contract, and (c) the judgment must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for an evidentiary hearing at which Dade County will have the burden to show--in order to be entitled to attorney's fees under the said contract of indemnity--that it defended the prior action and incurred attorney's fees herein although it was not negligent in the incident sued upon. Jones v. Holiday Inns, Inc., supra at 1034; see also Crystal River Enterprises v. NASI, Inc., 399 So.2d 77, 79 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (); Walter Taft Bradshaw & Associates v. Bedsole, 374 So.2d 644, 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) ().
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
S. Shore Hellenic Church, Inc. v. Artech Church Interiors, Inc.
...("burden is on the party seeking [common law] indemnity to prove he is entitled to it"); Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Dade County, 472 So.2d 866, 867 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985) (burden on indemnitee to establish facts leading to recovery) (paraphrasing Crystal River Enterprises v. NASI, Inc., 39......
-
INA Ins. Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Ins. Co.
...in order to receive indemnity either under a general indemnity agreement or under implied indemnity. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Dade County, 472 So.2d 866 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985) (contractual indemnity); Occidental Fire & Casualty Co. v. Stevenson, 370 So.2d 1211 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979) (......
-
S. Shore Hellenic Church, Inc. v. Artech Church Interiors, Inc.
...1986) ("burden is on the party seeking [common law] indemnity to prove he is entitled to it"); Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Dade County, 472 So.2d 866, 867 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1985) (burden on indemnitee to establish facts leading to recovery) (paraphrasing Crystal River Enterprises v. NASI, I......
-
Estate of King v. Wagoner County
...for their own defense.'" Id. at 827 (quoting Conrad v. Suhr, 274 N.W.2d 571, 578 (N.D.1979)). See also Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Dade County, 472 So.2d 866 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985); Byron Jackson Co. v. Woods, 41 Cal.App.2d 777, 107 P.2d 639 (1940). ¶ 59 As in Barsness, the agreement in the......