Wharton v. City University of New York

Citation287 A.D.2d 559,731 N.Y.S.2d 650
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Decision Date15 October 2001
PartiesPATRICIA WHARTON, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

O'Brien, J. P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 11 (b), a claim must set forth the nature of the claim and the time and place where it arose. Court of Claims Act § 11 (b) does not require "absolute exactness"; it requires a statement made with "sufficient definiteness to enable the State to be able to investigate the claim promptly and to ascertain its liability under the circumstances. The statement must be specific enough so as not to mislead, deceive or prejudice the rights of the State. In short, substantial compliance with section 11 is what is required" (Grumet v State of New York, 256 AD2d 441, 442 [internal quotation marks omitted]; Heisler v State of New York, 78 AD2d 767; see, Cobin v State of New York, 234 AD2d 498). However, "conclusory or general allegations of negligence that fail to [state] the manner in which the claimant was injured and how the State was negligent do not meet its requirements" (Grumet v State of New York, supra, at 442; Heisler v State of New York, supra, at 767-768). We agree with the Court of Claims that the claim satisfied the requirements of Court of Claims Act § 11 (b).

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Sacher v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 14 Diciembre 2022
    ...with Court of Claims Act § 11 (see Rodriguez v. State of New York, 8 A.D.3d at 647, 779 N.Y.S.2d 552 ; Wharton v. City Univ. of N.Y., 287 A.D.2d 559, 560, 731 N.Y.S.2d 650 ; Grumet v. State of New York, 256 A.D.2d 441, 442, 682 N.Y.S.2d 86 ; Cobin v. State of New York, 234 A.D.2d 498, 499, ......
  • Kimball Brooklands Corp. v. State, 2017–05438
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 26 Febrero 2020
    ...( Morra v. State of New York, 107 A.D.3d 1115, 1115, 967 N.Y.S.2d 169 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Wharton v. City Univ. of N.Y., 287 A.D.2d 559, 559, 731 N.Y.S.2d 650 ). However, "the claim must ‘provide a sufficiently detailed description of the particulars of the claim to enab......
  • Gabbur v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 Febrero 2022
    ...( Morra v. State of New York, 107 A.D.3d 1115, 1115, 967 N.Y.S.2d 169 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Wharton v. City Univ. of N.Y., 287 A.D.2d 559, 559, 731 N.Y.S.2d 650 ). However, "the claim must ‘provide a sufficiently detailed description of the particulars of the claim to enab......
  • Doe v. State
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • 13 Julio 2021
    ...the manner in which the claimant was injured and how the State was negligent do not meet... [the] requirements" section 11 (b) (Wharton, 287 A.D.2d at 560, Grumet, 256 A.D.2d at 442), and the failure to sufficiently particularize the nature of its claim constitutes a jurisdictional defect m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT