Whicker v. Compass Group USA, Inc.
Decision Date | 05 April 2016 |
Docket Number | No. COA15–1201.,COA15–1201. |
Citation | 784 S.E.2d 564,246 N.C.App. 791 |
Court | North Carolina Court of Appeals |
Parties | Crystal WHICKER, Employee, Plaintiff, v. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC./Crothall Services Group, Employer, Self–Insured (Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Administrator); and Novant Health, Inc., Alleged Joint Employer, Self–Insured, Defendants. |
Law Offices of James Scott Farrin, by Michael F. Roessler, for plaintiff-appellant.
Young Moore and Henderson P.A., Raleigh, by Angela Farag Craddock, for defendant-appellee Compass Group USA, Inc./Crothall Services Group.
Orbock Ruark & Dillard, PC, by Barbara E. Ruark, Winston–Salem and Jessica E. Lyles, for defendant-appellee Novant Health, Inc.
Crystal Whicker ("Plaintiff") appeals from the Opinion and Award of the Industrial Commission, which concluded she is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits from Defendant Novant Health, Inc. ("Novant"). We affirm.
Defendant Crothall Services Group ("Crothall") is a division of Defendant Compass Group USA, Inc. ("Compass Group"). Crothall contracts with healthcare organizations to provide standardized cleaning services of their facilities. In January 2013, Novant and Crothall entered into a contract, under which Crothall provided cleaning services to thirteen Novant healthcare facilities in North Carolina, including Forsyth Medical Center. Crothall provides 230 employees to clean Forsyth Medical Center's 1.8 million square foot facility.
The "Environmental Services and Supplies Agreement" between Crothall and Novant contains over fifty pages of Novant's specific expectations of Crothall's cleaning services. For example, Novant mandated that Crothall's housekeepers "[d]ust ledges over eye level including over bed lights," "spot clean interior of outside windows up to 6 feet," and "[d]ust all low ledges, furniture and equipment to a height of 6 feet from the floor."
Plaintiff was employed as an environmental services housekeeper by Crothall, and was assigned by Crothall to work at Forsyth Medical Center. On 2 June 2013, Plaintiff clocked out and left Forsyth Medical Center for her lunch break. Plaintiff fell, while walking in the parking lot of Forsyth Medical Center, and injured her left shoulder. She reported the injury to her supervisor at Crothall. Plaintiff was treated at the Forsyth Medical Center emergency room and diagnosed with a left shoulder fracture.
Compass Group filed a Form 19 (Employer's Report of Employee's Injury or Occupational Disease to the Industrial Commission) on 19 June 2013. On the same day, Compass Group filed a Form 61 (Denial of Workers' Compensation Claim), and alleged Plaintiff's injury "is not compensable as it is not causally related to her employment."
Plaintiff ultimately returned to her position as a housekeeper. On 4 November 2013, Plaintiff was observed by two other Crothall employees smoking an "e-cigarette" during an unauthorized break. Pursuant to Crothall policy, hourly employees must adhere to Novant's non-smoking policy, which prohibits smoking or the use of smokeless tobacco products while upon the hospital's premises. Plaintiff's employment was terminated later that day.
Plaintiff filed a Form 18 (Notice of Accident to Employer and Claim of Employee, Representative, or Dependent) on or about 11 November 2013, over five months after the accident. She listed both Crothall and Novant as employers on the Form 18. On or about 12 May 2014, Novant filed a Form 61 Denial of Plaintiff's claim.
Plaintiff's claim came for hearing before the Deputy Commissioner on 23 July 2014. The Deputy Commissioner concluded Plaintiff did not sustain an injury as the result of an accident during the course and scope of her employment. The Deputy Commissioner further concluded that Plaintiff was not a joint employee of Crothall and Novant, and denied her claim for workers' compensation benefits against Novant.
Plaintiff appealed the decision of the Deputy Commissioner to the Full Commission of the North Carolina Industrial Commission. The Full Commission made extensive and unchallenged findings to support its conclusion that no employment relationship existed between Plaintiff and Novant, including:
The Full Commission affirmed the holding of the Deputy Commissioner in an Opinion and Award entered 17 June 2015. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff argues the Commission erred by concluding no employment relationship existed between Plaintiff and Novant, under either the joint employment doctrine or the lent employee doctrine.
This Court reviews whether an employment relationship existed between Plaintiff and Novant under a de novo standard of review.
Morales–Rodriguez v. Carolina Quality Exteriors, Inc.,
205 N.C.App. 712, 714, 698 S.E.2d 91, 93 (2010). "The issue of whether an employer-employee relationship existed at the time of the injury ... is a jurisdictional fact." Id. (citing Lucas v. Li'l Gen. Stores, 289 N.C. 212, 218, 221 S.E.2d 257, 261 (1976) ).
[T]he finding of a jurisdictional fact by the Industrial Commission is not conclusive upon appeal even though there be evidence in the record to support such finding. The reviewing court has the right, and the duty, to make its own independent findings of such jurisdictional facts from its consideration of all the evidence in the record.
Id. (quoting Lucas, 289 N.C. at 218, 221 S.E.2d at 261 ).
Plaintiff argues the Commission erroneously concluded she was not an employee of Novant at the time of...
To continue reading
Request your trial- N.C. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. Parker Home Care, LLC
-
Menard v. United States, 4:15-CV-160-D
...As part ofits respondeat superior jurisprudence, North Carolina employs the coming-and-going rule. Whicker v. Compass Grp. USA, Inc., 784 S.E.2d 564, 568-69 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016); see Royster v. Culp, Inc., 343 N.C. 279, 281, 470 S.E.2d 30, 31 (1996). That rule provides that "an injury by ac......
- United States Cold Storage, Inc. v. Town of Warsaw
-
Estate of Belk by and through Belk v. Boise Cascade Wood Prods., L. L.C.
...to the Commission's findings on this jurisdictional issue, but reviews them de novo . See, e.g., Whicker v. Compass Group USA, Inc. , 246 N.C. App. 791, 795-96, 784 S.E.2d 564, 568 (2016) (reviewing "jurisdictional facts" de novo ).3 Our Supreme Court has held that a presumption exists that......