Whisman v. Georgia
| Citation | 16 L.Ed.2d 1001,384 U.S. 895,86 S.Ct. 1977 |
| Decision Date | 20 June 1966 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 1381,1381 |
| Parties | Woodrow WHISMAN v. GEORGIA. isc |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Reuben A. Garland and Beryl H. Weiner, for appellant.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Georgia, and Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. He would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, were not applied. He sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda v. State of Arizona. See dissenting opinion in Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 736, 86 S.Ct. 1782, 16 L.Ed.2d 894.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- State v. Laws
-
Green v. State
...the second poll that the jury was in fact unanimous. See Whisman v. State, 221 Ga. 460, 145 S.E.2d 499 (1965) cert. den. 384 U.S. 895, 86 S.Ct. 1977, 16 L.Ed.2d 1001. Hargett v. State, 151 Ga.App. 532, 260 S.E.2d 406 (1979). Third, the record shows that the response of the juror was due to ......
-
United States v. Johnson, 80-1608
...S.Ct. 1772, 1782, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (1966) (Black, J., with whom Douglas, J., joined, dissenting); Whisman v. Georgia, 384 U.S. 895, 86 S.Ct. 1977, 16 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1966) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 U.S., at 419, 86 S.Ct., at 467 (Black, J., with whom D......
- State v. Scofield