Whitaker v. State, 5D03-1907.
| Decision Date | 20 August 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D03-1907.,5D03-1907. |
| Citation | 881 So.2d 80 |
| Parties | Dale WHITAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Dale Whitaker (defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence which were entered by the trial court after he plead nolo contendere to the charge of lewd and lascivious battery. Concluding that the trial court erred in allowing the defendant to withdraw his plea in only one of two cases which were the subject of one negotiated plea agreement, we reverse.
The State filed two separate informations against the defendant alleging that he had committed the crimes of lewd and lascivious battery (and related counts) and sexual battery (and related counts) against two different minor victims. The parties entered into a plea agreement wherein the defendant agreed to plead no contest to one count in each case and, in return, the State agreed to nolle prosse the remaining charges and recommend concurrent sentences of five years imprisonment followed by ten years' sex offender probation. The trial court accepted the plea and, with the agreement of the prosecutor, gave the defendant a Quarterman1 release pending sentencing.
Prior to sentencing, the defendant filed a motion to withdraw his plea alleging newly discovered evidence. The alleged newly discovered evidence was testimony from a witness who claimed to have had a conversation with the victim in one of the cases wherein she stated the defendant had not committed any crime against her.
After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered an order granting the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea in the case involving the victim who was the subject of the newly discovered evidence, but denied the motion to withdraw the plea which was entered in the other case on the basis that none of the purported newly discovered evidence related to the charges in that case. The defendant then filed a second motion to withdraw his plea, arguing that the trial court's ruling was improper because the court failed to allow the defendant to withdraw his plea in both cases. The trial court denied the motion and then entered judgment on the plea which was entered in the second case and sentenced the defendant to a term of five years' imprisonment.
The defendant appeals, arguing that the trial court reversibly erred in denying his request to withdraw both of his pleas since the pleas entered in both cases constituted "one negotiated settlement of his charges." We agree.
In denying the defendant's request to withdraw the plea entered in the second case, the trial court erroneously relied on the decision in Livolsi v. State, 451 So.2d 542 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). While the court in Livolsi permitted the defendant to withdraw one of two pleas entered pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement in so doing the court only addressed the narrow issue of whether the defendant's plea to one count was voluntarily and knowingly entered. The court did not address the broader issue (which is presented here) as to whether the trial court possessed the legal authority to essentially separate out...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Blanton
...to determine that a plea agreement is indivisible and therefore not capable of being partially withdrawn. See, e.g., Whitaker v. State, 881 So.2d 80–82 (Fla.App., 2004) (holding that the trial court erred by granting only partial withdrawal of the defendant's guilty plea because the record ......
-
Small v. State, Case No. 2D16–725
...So.2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (quoting Williams v. State, 762 So.2d 990, 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ); see also Whitaker v. State, 881 So.2d 80, 82 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) ("When a defendant successfully challenges and is permitted to withdraw a plea of nolo contendere or guilty which was en......
-
State v. Harmon, No. 7-895/06-1990 (Iowa App. 2/13/2008)
...1982) (holding court did not "disturb the balance of the bargain" by granting partial withdrawal of the plea); Whitaker v. State, 881 So. 2d 80, 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004) (holding trial court erred in granting partial withdrawal of plea, as negotiated plea deal was a package); State v. ......
-
Crane v. State
...1372, 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)). Accordingly, we vacate Crane's sentences on the charges to which he pleaded, see Whitaker v. State, 881 So.2d 80, 82 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), and remand this case for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion to withdraw pleas. KHOUZAM and MOR......