White v. Butt
| Decision Date | 04 June 1897 |
| Citation | 27 S.E. 680,102 Ga. 552 |
| Parties | WHITE v. BUTT, Judge. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1.Even if an extraordinary motion for a new trial could be made in vacation, there was, in the present case, no error in declining to entertain the motion presented, nor does the refusal to certify the bill of exceptions complaining of such action afford any legal cause for granting a mandamus nisi against the judge.
2.The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which the motion for a new trial now brought to the attention of this court is based is merely cumulative to the case as disclosed in the record heretofore considered, and ought not to have produced a different result.It contains nothing giving to this proceeding "the peculiar characteristic of being an extraordinary motion."Cox v. Hillyer,65 Ga 57.
Application by Henry...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Coggeshall v. Park
... ... Hopkins, supra; Cox v. Hillyer, supra; Hanye v ... Candler, 99 Ga. 214, 25 S.E. 606; Perry v ... State, 102 Ga. 368, 30 S.E. 903; White v. Butt, ... 102 Ga. 552, 27 S.E. 680; Harris v. Roan, supra; S. A. L ... Ry. v. Reid, 6 Ga.App. 18, 63 S.E. 1130 ... 7 ... ...
-
Griffin v. Brand
...would produce a different verdict upon another trial. Malone v. Hopkins, supra; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214, 25 S.E. 606; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552, 27 S.E. 680; v. Candler, 102 Ga. 368, 30 S.E. 903; Cox v. Hillyer, supra. The above ruling, however, applies to cases where the alleged newl......
-
Griffin v. Brand
...compel him to certify a bill of exceptions assigning error upon such refusal (Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379, 46 S. E. 433; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552, 27 S. E. 680; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Reid, 6 Ga. App. 18, 63 S. E. 1130); but, where he does, in fact, entertain the motion and hears and de......