White v. McNabb

Decision Date30 November 1910
Citation140 Ky. 828
PartiesWhite v. McNabb.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from Powell Circuit Court.

R. W. SMITH and J. D. ADKINSON for appellant.

C. F. SPENCER for appellee.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY WM. ROGERS CLAY, COMMISSIONER — Reversing.

Claiming that he was the owner and entitled to the possession of a tract of five acres of land, known as the Coal Bank land, situated on White's Branch in Powell county, Kentucky, and that appellant was wrongfully withholding possession thereof, appellee, H. S. McNabb, brought this action against appellant, J. B. White, for the recovery of the land. Appellant denied appellee's title, and pleaded title in himself. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee. From the judgment based thereon, this appeal is prosecuted.

It is the contention of appellant that the court erred to his prejudice in failing to award him a peremptory instruction at the conclusion of the evidence for appellee. To determine this question it will be necessary to set forth the evidence at some length.

The appellee was introduced as a witness in his own behalf, and testified as follows:

"I am 70 years old, and live in Powell county, about three miles from the land described in the petition, which is mine known as the Coal Bank and have known the boundary of land on White's Branch of which this five-acre boundary is a part for about fifty years. My father Isaac McNabb settled on a large tract of land on White's Branch and lived there about 30 or 40 years claiming and occupying same as his own, grazing and raising stock on it. Dug coal from the coal bank and his possession was never questioned by any one. In about 1870 he sold the five acres upon which the coal bank is situated to my brother, James McNabb, and made him a deed for it. He sold some of this land to a Mr. Maple about the time they were building the K. U. Railroad my brother James sold this five acres on which the coal bank is on to O. V. Forkner, * * * and made a deed for it. O. V. Forkner hired me to make him a road to the coal bank and I helped him to dig coal and hauled it to his house on several occasions and his title was never questioned. After O. V. Forkner's death I bought this land from Mrs. Mary E Forkner, the widow of O. V. Forkner, and paid her cash for it and she made me a deed for it. This was in 1896. When I bought the land there was a small house on it. Mrs. Forkner had the house rented to J. M. Daniel and J. B. Derickson as her tenants. The understanding was that Daniel and Derickson were to pay me the rent on the house. When they abandoned it they were to deliver the keys to me. This five-acre tract is separate and apart from the Quisenberry tract. Some five or six years ago Mr. J. B. White took possession of the house and land and has been claiming it ever since. I have a copy of a survey made for James McNabb by R. M. Jones, surveyor, dated June 19, 1888."

To all these statements as to the possession of the land and of the deeds mentioned by the witness the appellant objected. The court overruled the objections, and the appellant at the time excepted.

At this point appellee introduced the survey covering the land in controversy, which was made for James McNabb to O. V. Forkner. The survey is dated January 7th, 1888. He also introduced a deed, dated April 4th, 1896, from Mary E. Forkner, who was the widow of O. V. Forkner, to himself. This deed does not appear to have been recorded.

James McNabb and two other witnesses testified for appellee as follows:

"I (James McNabb) am a brother of the plaintiff and own one-third or have a third interest in the tract of land in controversy. (Defendant objected to this statement of ownership and the court overruled the objection; whereupon the defendant at the time excepted.)

"My father claimed the land on White's Branch and ranged stock there until he sold out many years ago, and I never heard of anyone claiming it against him until about 20 years ago when the Quisenberrys came in there and claimed the land. They put mills in there and had the timber cut and John Daniel had a mill there from about 1891 to 1892 on four or five years cutting the timber. The Quisenberrys had tenants there and after the defendant White bought the land he has been in possession. I claim one-third of the five-acre tract, but refused to join in this suit. (Defendant objected to this statement of ownership, which was overruled, and the defendant at the time excepted.)

"The five-acre tract which covers the coal bank was deeded to me by my father about 30 years ago and we marked off the boundary when the deed was made and had a survey made in 1888, which survey is the same as described in the petition. I afterwards sold an interest to O. V. Forkner, who died sometime thereafter and I and also Mrs. Forkner dug coal up at this bank when Orlando Forkner dug coal whenever he wanted it and we were never disturbed in anyway. The survey of the Quisenberry tract under which the defendant White claimed does not cover this coal bank. It may touch one corner of the five acres. I saw Mr. Spencer survey the Quisenberry lines."

Asa Bowen was then introduced, and testified as follows:

"I have known this land for a great number of years, and remember when Isaac McNabb once claimed it and lived on the land on White's Branch for 30 years more than thirty years ago."

James Derickson testified as follows:

"I was on White's Branch in the year 1895, when John Daniel was sawing the timber there and in the fall of that year one...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Fugate v. Martin
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 12 Diciembre 1933
    ... ... Courtney v ... Ashcraft, 105 S.W. 106, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 1324; ... Ashcraft v. Courtney (Ky.) 121 S.W. 625; White ... v. McNabb, 140 Ky. 828, 131 S.W. 1021; Logan v ... Williams, 159 Ky. 412, 167 S.W. 124; Id., 160 Ky. 641, ... 170 S.W. 22; Bibb v. Daniels, ... ...
  • Sexton v. Ely
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 25 Noviembre 1914
    ... ... Hinton, 4 Bibb. 559; Continental Realty Co. v ... Harvey, 151 Ky. 703, 152 S.W. 755; Bassett v ... Lush, 156 Ky. 490, 161 S.W. 227; White v ... McNabb, 140 Ky. 828, 131 S.W. 1021; Richie v ... Owsley, 137 Ky. 63, 121 S.W. 1015 ...          If, ... however, we were of ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT