White v. McRae
| Decision Date | 19 March 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 51759,51759 |
| Citation | 380 So.2d 1390 |
| Parties | Jerry Blaine WHITE, Sr. v. Charles R. McRAE. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Bryan, Nelson, Allen & Schroeder, John W. Chapman, Pascagoula, for appellant.
Gibbes, Graves, Mullins, Bullock & Ferris, Ernest W. Graves, Laurel, Dixon L. Pyles, Jackson, for appellee.
Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and COFER, JJ.
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Jerry Blaine White, Sr. filed a declaration alleging that Charles McRae negligently permitted the statute of limitations to run on a workmen's compensation claim entrusted to him as attorney for White. McRae answered, denying professional malpractice counterclaimed for malicious prosecution, and later moved to dismiss the declaration. The court below granted the motion to dismiss, reasoning in part that White had "elected his remedies" by previously filing with the Mississippi State Bar an unsuccessful complaint against McRae based upon the same conduct giving rise to the declaration in tort.
White improvidently appealed the dismissal, and we refused to reach the merits of the case, because the pendency of McRae's counterclaim deprived the order of the finality requisite to our jurisdiction. White v. McRae, 366 So.2d 231 (Miss.1979). On remand, however, McRae took a voluntary nonsuit on his counterclaim, thus removing the interlocutory character of the order dismissing White's declaration. White now appeals that order once more, this time with a final judgment conferring upon this Court jurisdiction to reach the merits. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
We think neither principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel by judgment, nor election of remedies prevented White from pursuing a private tort remedy in the circuit court for money damages after failing to obtain satisfaction at the Mississippi State Bar. The statutory function of the latter tribunal is public; viz., it disciplines and in appropriate cases expels members of the bar. MCA § 73-3-301 et seq. (Supp.1979); In Re Mississippi State Bar, 361 So.2d 503 (Miss.1978). Unlike the circuit courts of this state, it is a quasi-judicial forum at most, powerless to offer jury trials or money judgments. It follows that White's Mississippi State Bar complaint, regardless of its ultimate disposition, had no effect whatsoever upon his right later to pursue a private remedy in the circuit court. See gen. Banes v. Thompson, 352 So.2d 812 (Miss.1977); Lumberton...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United Companies Mortg. of Mississippi, Inc. v. Jones, 54645
...328 (1850); Thompson v. Erving's Hatcheries, Inc. 186 So.2d 756 (Miss.1966); Nause v. Goldman, 321 So.2d 304 (Miss.1975); White v. McRae, 380 So.2d 1390 (Miss.1980). The complaint in this cause framed the issues as a case of negligence. There is no reason to conclude that an action against ......
-
Hutchinson v. Smith
...legal malpractice action. Thompson v. Erving's Hatcheries, supra, and Nause, supra, both involved questions of negligence. White v. McRae, 380 So.2d 1390 (Miss.1980), makes it quite clear that a tort action may be maintained in a legal malpractice claim. In finding that an aggrieved client'......