White v. Ross

• Decision Date: 12 January 1882
• Citation: 11 N.W. 227,47 Mich. 172
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court
• Parties: WHITE v. ROSS.

11 N.W. 227

47 Mich. 172

WHITE v. ROSS.

Supreme Court of Michigan

January 12, 1882

Rehearing denied. For former opinion, see 10 N.W. 188.

Motion for rehearing.

Edwin C. Conely, for the motion.

E.R. Hutchins and Thomas M. Crocker, against.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for a rehearing in this case is denied. On the argument the court was satisfied that the plaintiff below, when he offered in evidence the letters of his wife to show her affection for him, had made no showing entitling him to go to the jury on the question whether the defendants had wrongfully interfered in his family concerns. In the absence of such a showing by him, evidence of her affection was immaterial, and the objection made to the letters was well taken, unless it was obviated by a showing made subsequently. No such showing appears to have been made.