White v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Inc.
| Decision Date | 08 June 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. C-1643,C-1643 |
| Parties | Richard WHITE, d/b/a Hewlett-White, Petitioner, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Atlas & Hall, David H. Hockema and Lisa Powell, McAllen, for petitioner.
Ewers, Toothaker, Ewers, Abbott, Talbot, Hamilton & Jarvis, Neil Norquest, McAllen, Jerry R. Tucker, Jr., San Antonio, for respondent.
Richard White, doing business as Hewlett-White, instituted this suit against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, Inc., for lost profits resulting from Southwestern Bell's incorrect listing of his telephone number in the yellow pages. The trial court granted Southwestern Bell's motion for an instructed verdict. The court of appeals affirmed. 1 We reverse the judgments of the courts below and remand the cause to the trial court.
In 1977, Richard White, the owner of Hewlett-White florist shop, sought to expand his business and entered into an agreement with Southwestern Bell for advertising in the yellow pages of the telephone book to be released in February, 1978. When the new issue came out, the phone number for Hewlett-White was listed correctly in the white pages and in one small yellow-page listing. The number, however, was listed incorrectly in the large pictorial yellow-page advertisement purchased by White. The testimony indicated that the number listed for Hewlett-White was that of an insurance company. After White complained, the telephone company assured him that an "intercept" service would be instituted, enabling incoming calls to that number to be screened and then routed to the correct party, either to the flower shop or to the insurance company. Whether this was done or not is disputed by the parties. White testified that some times, when he called the number, he would receive a message that it was not a working number.
Southwestern Bell filed a motion for instructed verdict on several grounds. The trial court granted the motion, but failed to specify the basis for its instructed verdict. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment on the basis that White did not establish a loss in net profits with a reasonable degree of certainty.
In reviewing the trial court's granting of an instructed verdict, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the party against whom the verdict is instructed. Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Page, 553 S.W.2d 98 (Tex.1977). If there is any conflicting evidence of probative nature in the record, a determination of the issue is for the jury. Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Harrison-Wilson-Pearson, 151 Tex. 635, 253 S.W.2d 422 (1952). After considering all of the evidence in the light most favorable to White, we have determined that the case should have been submitted to the jury.
To recover for a loss of profits, it is not necessary that the loss be susceptible to exact calculation. Southwest Battery Corporation v. Owen, 131 Tex. 423, 115 S.W.2d 1097, 1098 (1938). It is sufficient that the amount of loss is shown by competent evidence with reasonable certainty. Id. Where there is an established business, pre-existing profits may be used to evidence the amount of loss with reasonable certainty. Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Estate of Tom Slick, 386 S.W.2d 180, 188 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1964, writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 403 S.W.2d 784 (Tex.1965); Richker v. Georgandis, 323 S.W.2d 90, 98 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston 1959, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Furthermore, in calculating the loss in profits, the normal increase in the business which might have been expected in the light of past developments and existing conditions may be considered. Southwest Battery Corporation v. Owen, 115 S.W.2d at 1099.
The evidence showed that Hewlett-White has been an established business for thirty-three years and has consistently shown profits. Additionally, there was evidence that the sale of flowers is not an uncertain or...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz and Schatz, Ribicoff and Kotkin, 15730
... ... New Haven Gas Co., 151 Conn. 274, 280, 197 A.2d 73 (1964); see also C. Tait ... 's "past profit experience on other projects"); White v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 651 S.W.2d 260, 263 ... ...
-
Democracy Coalition v. City of Austin
...all contrary evidence and inferences. Szczepanik v. First S. Trust Co., 883 S.W.2d 648, 649 (Tex.1994); White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 651 S.W.2d 260, 262 (Tex.1983). If there is any conflicting evidence of probative value that raises a material fact issue on any theory of recovery, a......
-
Turner v. PV Intern. Corp., 05-87-01123-CV
...at the time when the contract was breached or the tort was committed is admissible to show lost profits. See White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 651 S.W.2d 260, 262 (Tex.1983). Proof of an operation of a business at a loss, without more, fails to meet the test of showing lost profits with ......
-
C. TERRY ENTERPRISES v. City of Hartford
...can usually provide data from which future prospects [of profitability] can reasonably be projected"); White v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 651 S.W.2d 260, 263 (Tex.1983) (profits earned by plaintiff's florist shop prior to defendant's breach of contract relevant to determination of lo......