White v. State, 93-1727

Decision Date28 September 1993
Docket NumberNo. 93-1727,93-1727
Citation624 So.2d 811
Parties18 Fla. L. Weekly D2151 Tommy WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Tommy White, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Tommy White appeals an order denying his motion to correct sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Upon the State's confession of error, with which we entirely agree, the sentencing order must be corrected to conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence entered on May 27, 1987. At that time the trial court ordered that the sentence in the present case would run concurrent to any sentence imposed on his then pending parole violation. The sentencing order failed to so specify. Accordingly, we reverse the order entered pursuant to the Rule 3.800(a) motion, and remand with directions to amend the sentencing order nunc pro tunc to May 27, 1987, in accordance with the trial court's oral sentencing announcement contained in the sentencing transcript.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Whitehead v. State, 94-1955
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 10 Mayo 1995
    ... ... State, 636 So.2d 890, 891 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Trueblood v. State, 635 So.2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); White v ... State, 624 So.2d 811, 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Armstead v. State, 612 So.2d 623, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So.2d 948, ... ...
  • Higginbotham v. State, 95-1556
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 Agosto 1995
    ...conform with the written sentence. We have jurisdiction. Sellers v. State, 591 So.2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see also White v. State, 624 So.2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). On the face of the record, a discrepancy exists between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence. In the context of ......
  • Nodal v. State, 94-259
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 22 Febrero 1995
    ...entered in a criminal case must conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement of sentence in open court. See, e.g., White v. State, 624 So.2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Urquiaga v. State, 624 So.2d 810 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Kord v. State, 508 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The final judgment o......
  • Friedberg v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp., 93-992
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Septiembre 1993
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT