White v. State

Decision Date22 January 1981
Docket NumberNo. 2-280A46,2-280A46
PartiesDavid E. WHITE and Robert D. Box, Appellants (Defendants below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).
CourtIndiana Appellate Court

Frank E. Spencer, Indianapolis, for appellants.

Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. (as of 1/12/81), Jeff G. Fihn, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.

SHIELDS, Judge.

Appellants David E. White and Robert D. Box appeal their convictions of robbery alleging they were denied effective assistance of trial counsel. 1

We reverse.

Counsel is presumed to have prepared and executed his client's defense effectively. This presumption will be disturbed only upon strong and convincing proof that what counsel did or did not do made the proceedings a mockery of justice and shocks the conscience of the reviewing court. In resolving this issue the reviewing court will consider the totality of the circumstances surrounding counsel's pretrial preparation and the actual conduct of the trial. Reversible error will be found if counsel failed to provide the defendant with adequate legal representation. Sotelo v. State, (1980) Ind., 408 N.E.2d 1215; Crisp v. State, (1979) Ind., 394 N.E.2d 115; Magley v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 618, 335 N.E.2d 811; Thomas v. State, (1969) 251 Ind. 546, 242 N.E.2d 919.

The evidence adduced at trial is as follows:

On August 14, 1978 shortly after 10 p. m., James C. Moore and Philip Dudley, employees of a United Oil service station, were walking to their cars after closing the station for the night. As they approached the cars, two men, both wearing disguises and one carrying a sawed-off shotgun, ran from behind the building and demanded money. Upon being unable to get any money, the disguised men took Moore's car which was later found abandoned nearby. Neither Moore nor Dudley were able to identify the two men who had committed the robbery.

However, appellants' ex-roommate, Kevin Welsh, testified appellants had bragged and boasted a day or two later about committing the robbery. His testimony as to what appellants had told him about the robbery corresponded with Moore and Dudley's version of it.

The evidence further revealed appellants and Welsh had rented a house together for about two months prior to August 14. About a month after the rental commenced Welsh learned appellants were planning to move to Florida and felt they were going to "hang" him with all the bills. On August 16 or 17 Welsh asked appellants to leave because he was "fed up" with paying the bills. For unexplained reasons Welsh did not report his knowledge of the robbery to the police until August 21.

Appellants testified they witnessed the robbery from the parking lot of the Paper Arts Company which is located across the street from the station. Appellants were sitting in White's car in the lot waiting for Chuck Bernett to take his lunch break. They followed Moore's car as it left the station but lost sight of it when it turned into a residential area. As appellants were leaving the area, they noticed a car parked in some bushes beside the road. While they told Welsh what they had seen, they did not tell the police because they did not want to get involved.

On rebuttal, Moore testified the Paper Arts Company did not have a night shift and there were no cars parked in its lot when the service station closed.

Upon this evidence, appellants were convicted of robbery.

The hearing held on appellants' motion to correct errors revealed trial counsel's ill health. At the time of trial, defense counsel was seventy years old. He had suffered a heart attack before the original trial date, causing a postponement of the trial. During the one-day trial, counsel was taking five different medications, some several times daily. Counsel was required to lie down in the judge's chamber to rest during the trial. Two or three days after the trial concluded counsel suffered a heart arrest.

Counsel, with commendable candor, stated he would be hard put to say he was in the best of shape on the day of trial and questioned his own judgments made during the trial.

From the record presented we must agree that counsel's ill health seriously impeded his ability to provide adequate legal representation. 2

The hearing on the motion to correct errors revealed the following. First, counsel failed to call Chuck Bernett as a witness. Bernett, if called as a witness at the trial, would have testified he was to meet appellants on his lunch break at the Paper Arts Company and, further, that as he came out of the building he saw White's car leaving the parking lot. Prior to trial, appellants had informed counsel of Bernett and his probable testimony. However, counsel did not meet with Bernett until the morning of trial and was not quite sure what Bernett would testify to until he talked with him that morning. Bernett, although not subpoenaed, did appear the morning of trial, as he had verbally agreed, but informed counsel he had to leave for work in the afternoon. Appellants unsuccessfully urged counsel to call Bernett before he left which was prior to the close of the State's case. During the defense, counsel told the trial court he had a witness who had left and unsuccessfully attempted to summarize the expected testimony. Counsel did not ask the court for a recess or continuance in order to obtain Bernett's testimony.

The record further shows counsel was aware of evidence which could have cast serious doubt on the credibility of Kevin Welsh, the only witness who connected appellants with the crime. Counsel failed to present such evidence either through cross-examination of Welsh or other witnesses.

The impeaching evidence can be summarized briefly as follows: On August 18,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Johnson v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 7 Enero 1982
    ...45 Ill.Dec. 428, 412 N.E.2d 1010 (1980); People v. Brinson, 80 Ill.App.3d 388, 35 Ill.Dec. 721, 399 N.E.2d 1010 (1980); White v. State, 414 N.E.2d 973 (Ind.App.1981); State v. Moon, Mo.App., 602 S.W.2d 828 (1980); Com. v. Newmiller, 487 Pa. 410, 409 A.2d 834 (1979); Flores v. State, 576 S.W......
  • Adams v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 26 Enero 1982
    ...396 N.E.2d 898; Crisp v. State, (1979) Ind., 394 N.E.2d 115; Cottingham v. State, (1978) 269 Ind. 261, 379 N.E.2d 984; White v. State, (1981) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 973; Lyles v. State, (1978) Ind.App., 382 N.E.2d 991. A true application of this standard demands a constitutional scrutiny of t......
  • Wilkins v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 28 Septiembre 1981
    ...the effective assistance of counsel...." This principle resulted in a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel in White v. State (1981), Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 973, wherein defense counsel's unawareness of a Bruton problem (Bruton v. United States (1968), 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L......
  • State v. Moorman
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 28 Julio 1987
    ...F.2d 831 (9th Cir.1984) (new trial ordered when attorney was asleep or dozing during a substantial part of the trial); White v. State, 414 N.E.2d 973 (Ind.App.1981) (new trial ordered when attorney ill and taking five different medications); and Ex Parte Love, 468 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.Crim.App.1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT