White v. State, No. 51431

Decision Date05 December 1975
Docket NumberNo. 51431,No. 2
Citation137 Ga.App. 9,223 S.E.2d 24
PartiesJ. A. WHITE v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Erwin Mitchell, E. Neil Wester, Dalton, for appellant.

Samuel J. Brantley, Dist. Atty., Dalton, for appellee.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

Appellant/defendant was charged with the murder of his brother-in-law. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of voluntary manslaughter. He was sentenced to the custody of the Youthful Offender Division of the State Board of Corrections 'for a term not to exceed six (6) years.' From this verdict and sentence, his appeal was filed with this court. Held:

1. Defendant alleges that the court erred in permitting a member of the jury to transcribe, in shorthand, a portion of the court's recharge on the definition of the offenses of murder and voluntary manslaughter. After the jury had been charged and sequestered, it requested the recharge. The foreman asked the court if a member of the jury, a secretary, could 'take this down in shorthand.' The court had no objection and the record reveals that no one else voiced any objection.

Ordinarily the taking of notes by jurors during a trial is not considered to be error, and in the absence of special or unusual circumstances, the matter will be left to the discretion of the judge. Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga.App. 154, 157(4), 202 S.E.2d 529. Our Supreme Court held in Gholston v. Gholston, 31 Ga. 625, 638, that the sending of the written charge into the sequestered jury was 'an unsafe practice.' However, the later decision of Chattahoochee Brick Co. v. Sullivan, 86 Ga. 50(6), 12 S.E. 216, held that where the charge is sent out with the jury if 'no objection was made by counsel . . . we think it is no cause for a new trial.' 86 Ga. at 67, 12 S.E. at 221. It is the duty of counsel to make seasonal objection to any matter deemed error or injurious to the rights of his client. The absence of objection indicates to this court his legal view at trial of the practice or procedure he observed and countenanced by his silence.

An enumeration of error complaining of admission of evidence or of documents going out with the jury presents nothing for decision by this court where no objection was made at the trial. Morris v. State, 200 Ga. 471(1), 37 S.E.2d 345. Accord: McKay v. State, 200 Ga. 120(3b), 36 S.E.2d 55; Smithwick v. State, 199 Ga. 292(10), 34 S.E.2d 28. If counsel know of misconduct on the part of the jury during trial, they should bring the same to the attention of the court immediately, or it will be held to have been waived. Lyman v. State, 69 Ga. 404(4). The procedure complained of here was waived by failure to object.

2. On May 13, 1974, counsel for defendant demanded 'a list of the names of the witnesses upon whose testimony such charge is founded, and who were sworn and gave evidence thereon before the grand jury.' Defendant was provided a partial list of witnesses who would be called by the state. Four witnesses were called and testified for the state whose names were not on the list provided. Defendant's objections to their testimony were overruled. He enumerates this as error.

Defendant was provided with a copy of the indictment, which had a partial list of the witnesses used, on July 13, 1974. The defendant and both of his counsel signed a statement on the indictment which reads: 'The defendant John Alan White waives copy of Bill of Indictment and list of witnesses . . .' The defendant waived his right to the list of witnesses and the prosecution was entitled to rely on this waiver. Parr v. State, 117 Ga.App. 484(1), 160 S.E.2d 865.

The defendant contended that they did not waive a list of the witnesses and so stated at the arraignment. The court recessed to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Williamson v. State, 53637
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 3 d2 Maio d2 1977
    ...of jury note taking is left to the discretion of the trial judge. Holcomb v. State, 130 Ga.App. 154, 202 S.E.2d 529; White v. State, 137 Ga.App. 9, 223 S.E.2d 24. Therefore, we cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion or expressed an opinion by such 4. Appellant argues that the......
  • Smart v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 11 d1 Fevereiro d1 2002
    ...v. State, 246 Ga.App. 133, 134(1), 539 S.E.2d 849 (2000); Gay, supra, 233 Ga.App. at 741(5), 505 S.E.2d 29. 20. See White v. State, 137 Ga.App. 9, 10(1), 223 S.E.2d 24 (1975) ("An enumeration of error complaining of admission of evidence or of documents going out with the jury presents noth......
  • Owens v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 9 d3 Outubro d3 2013
    ...(trial court did not abuse discretion in instructing juror not to take notes because the case was not complicated); White v. State, 137 Ga.App. 9, 10(1), 223 S.E.2d 24 (1975) (in absence of special or unusual circumstances, note-taking left to judge's discretion). We find no special or unus......
  • Miller Distributing Co. v. Rollins
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 14 d2 Setembro d2 1982
    ...out with the jury presents nothing for decision by this court where no objection was made at the trial. [Cits.]" White v. State, 137 Ga.App. 9, 10, 223 S.E.2d 24 (1975). Accordingly, we find this enumeration of error to be without merit. See McKay v. State, 200 Ga. 120, 121(3), 36 S.E.2d 55......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT