White v. Steele

Decision Date13 November 1930
Docket NumberNo. 2462.,2462.
Citation33 S.W.2d 224
PartiesWHITE v. STEELE.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Knollenberg & Cameron, of El Paso, for plaintiff in error.

J. Walker Morrow and Fryer & Cunningham, all of El Paso, for defendant in error.

WALTHALL, J.

P. C. Steele brought this suit against James C. White, alleging that under and by virtue of a certain lease contract of date May 18, 1929, plaintiff leased to defendant a certain storeroom in the Hotel Sheldon building, under the terms of which contract defendant became obligated to pay plaintiff the sums for which he sues; that defendant entered and held possession of said premises under said contract until the rent for which he sues became due and payable.

Defendant White answered substantially as follows: A plea in abatement that he and plaintiff entered into a lease contract by the terms of which defendant should occupy the premises described for two years from June 1, 1928, with an extension agreement, as in said lease; that Steele upon the expiration of the lease by lapse of time, and not otherwise, would execute to White, and would accept a lease upon said premises for three years from June 30, 1930, with the same terms and conditions as in said executed lease; that on April 9, 1929, the Hotel Sheldon building, or more than 50 per cent. of its value, was totally destroyed by fire; that on account of the destruction of said building the relation of landlord and tenant, as theretofore existed, did not exist between plaintiff and defendant after said fire; that plaintiff had no right under said lease contract to collect rent from defendant after the destruction of said building by fire on April 9, 1929; that plaintiff had the entire building leased from Albert Mathias, the owner, who elected not to rebuild; and that by reason thereof plaintiff's rights under the lease contract terminated. Defendant prayed that plaintiff's suit be abated. The court overruled the plea.

Defendant further answered by general denial; specially denied that there was a lease contract in effect, between plaintiff and defendant after the destruction of the building on April 9, 1929.

White admits that he occupied said premises after April 9, 1929, and until August 20, 1930, but not as plaintiff's tenant; pleads that the lease contract between the owner of the building and Steele provides that Steele should pay to the owner his rent in monthly payments in advance, "unless the premises are destroyed or rendered untenantable by the act of God or the public enemy, or other cause beyond the control of the parties of the second part."

White alleges the destruction of the building by fire, a cause beyond the control of Steele.

White pleaded a cross-action in damages against Steele. The court dismissed White's cross-action.

The case was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff Steele for $600. White prosecutes this appeal by writ of error.

Opinion.

The court made no findings of fact. The facts controlling the rights of the parties are undisputed, and the issues presented, as we view it, are purely matters of law.

Steele brought this suit on the lease or rental contract between himself and White. The contract states the amount of the annual rent to be paid to Steele by White, to be paid in equal monthly installments in advance. White had paid all the rent due under the contract to the time of the fire, which occurred on April 9, 1929. The rent contract extended from June 1, 1928, to June 30, 1930. White continued to occupy the rented premises after the fire up to August 20, 1929. This suit is on the rent contract and for the rental value of the premises as provided in the rent contract for the time White occupied the premises after the fire; that is, from April 9 to August 20, 1929. The Hotel Sheldon building was several stories in height, was used by Steele as a hotel at all times, except as to a number of rooms on the lower floor of the building which were rented and used by tenants for business purposes, in no way connected with the business of the hotel. White's business was that of real estate and insurance and the rental contract confined his use of the premises to his business as stated. White occupied rooms on the ground floor and on the east side of the hotel building. The fire started on one of the upper floors of the building and apparently on the west side. The fire resulted in a total destruction of the roof and upper portion of the building, its water and light system to all parts of the building, and destroyed the entire building to more than 50 per cent. of its value. The city of El Paso acting under a city ordinance refused a repair and rebuilding of the entire hotel building, gave notice to Steele and tenants to vacate, and had the building torn down. After the fire the entire building was roped off, though some of the tenants on the ground floor on the east side, including White, continued to occupy the building until the extent of the damaged condition of the building after the fire was determined by the city, and the city was ready to begin to raze the building. After the fire, on account of the condition of the building, Steele was not able to further carry out the provisions of his lease contract with the tenants; he ceased operating the building as a hotel under his lease contract with the owner, and moved out of the building.

There is no stipulation in the lease contract...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Glass v. Smith
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 28 novembre 1951
    ...it to divest the city council of its legal rights as governing body of the city'. Jazwinski v. City of Milwaukee, 253 Wis. 17, 33 S.W.2d 224, 226. If it were held that the Act invests the Commission exclusively with power to create classifications its failure to act would deprive the Counci......
  • Crow Lumber & Bldg. Materials Co. v. Washington County Library Bd., 32833
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 16 avril 1968
    ...that we were in error in the application of the general rule to the case at bar. by the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso, 33 S.W.2d 224. In that case White conducted a real estate and insurance business in certain leased rooms on the ground floor of the Hotel Sheldon building. After......
  • Gonzalez v. Cavazos
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 5 juin 1980
    ...1926) aff'd, 298 S.W. 397 (Tex.Com.App.1927) (destruction of building where lease had provision about repair in case of fire); White v. Steele, 33 S.W.2d 224 (Tex.Civ.App. El Paso 1930, no writ) (partial destruction of building where part of building was under lease by party sought to be ch......
  • Tuloma Rigging, Inc. v. Barge & Crane Rentals, Division of Houston Shell & Concrete, Division of McDonough Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 18 novembre 1970
    ...Phillipoff, 66 Fla. 549, 64 So. 269. See also Norman v. Stark Grain & Elevator Co., 237 S.W. 963, 966, (Tex.Civ.App.), writ ref.; White v. Steele, 33 S.W.2d 224, (Tex.Civ.App.), no writ; 8 C.J.S. Bailments § 36 b, pp. 454-455 . In the present case appellant's allegations, upon which appelle......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT