White v. White
Decision Date | 19 February 1906 |
Citation | 53 S.E. 371,73 S.C. 261 |
Parties | WHITE v. WHITE. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Sumpter County; Watts Judge.
Action by Anthony White and others and Mary A. White against Elizabeth White and others. From a decree for plaintiffs defendants appeal. Reversed.
Lee & Moise, for appellant. Cooper & Fraser, for respondent.
The question presented by the exceptions is whether his honor the circuit judge, erred, in construing the legacies mentioned in the following provisions of the testator's will to be specific, to wit:
The rules for determining whether a legacy is specific or demonstrative are clearly stated by Mr. Justice Jones, in the recent case of Rogers v. Rogers, 67 S.C. 168, 45 S.E. 176, 100 Am. St. Rep. 721. General, specific, and demonstrative legacies are thus defined in 18 Enc. of Law 711, 714, 721: "A general legacy is one which is payable out of the general assets of the testator's estate, being a gift of money or other thing in quantity and not in any way separate or distinct from other things of the like kind." "A specific legacy or devise is a gift by will of a specific article or part of the testator's estate, which is identified and distinguished from all other things of the same kind, and which may be satisfied only out of the particular thing." "A demonstrative legacy is a gift of money or other fundable goods, charged on a particular fund, in such a way as not amount to a gift of the corpus of the fund or to evince an intent to relieve the general estate from liability in case the fund fails." In Crawford v. McCarthy (N. Y.) 54 N.E. 278, the principles are thus stated: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial