Whitehead v. Centerville Fire Dist.

Decision Date28 October 1982
Citation90 A.D.2d 655,456 N.Y.S.2d 450
PartiesJames WHITEHEAD, et al., Respondents, v. CENTERVILLE FIRE DISTRICT, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

John J. Quackenbush, Jr., Newburgh (Roger F. Kujawski, Goshen, of counsel), for appellant.

Schirmer, Hrdlicka & Van Benschoten, Saugerties (David Van Benschoten, Saugerties, of counsel), for respondents.

Before MAHONEY, P.J., and SWEENEY, MAIN, MIKOLL and YESAWICH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered September 25, 1981 in Ulster County, which granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law.

On October 28, 1980, plaintiff Christina Whitehead was seriously injured when the vehicle she was operating came into contact with defendant's fire engine, which was being driven by the captain of the fire company, as it was responding to a call for assistance. The occurrence was immediately reported by defendant to the Ulster County Fire Control. Within 90 days after the accident, defendant's insurer was made aware of the incident; plaintiffs' no-fault carrier, with whom they had filed a no-fault claim with supporting medical reports, and defendant's insurer are one and the same. Also during this period, the fire district's attorney, in a letter specifically adverting to this accident and his law partner's representation of plaintiffs in the anticipated litigation, resigned.

Because plaintiffs' counsel mistakenly believed one was unnecessary, a notice of claim was not filed. Suit was commenced in June, 1981. When defendant interposed, as an affirmative defense, plaintiffs' failure to comply with section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, permission to file a belated notice of claim was sought and obtained and this appeal followed.

We find no abuse of discretion. Defendant had actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim; its employees were present and involved in the collision itself (Coonradt v. Averill Park Cent. School Dist., 75 A.D.2d 925, 427 N.Y.S.2d 531; Matter of Matey v. Bethlehem Cent. School Dist., 63 A.D.2d 807, 405 N.Y.S.2d 156). Not only did defendant have adequate notice of the accident and an opportunity to investigate, but there is nothing in the record to suggest it will suffer by reason of the late service of the notice of claim (Beatty v. County of Saratoga, 74 A.D.2d 662, 424 N.Y.S.2d 772...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Caselli v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 31, 1984
    ...hours after its occurrence, plaintiff's late notice of claim should have been deemed timely served. In Whitehead v. Centerville Fire District, 90 A.D.2d 655, 456 N.Y.S.2d 450, plaintiff was injured when her car was struck by a fire truck driven by a fire company captain, which accident was ......
  • Irizarry v. New York City Housing Authority
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 19, 1990
    ...Hous. Auth., 149 A.D.2d 495, 539 N.Y.S.2d 977; Wolf v. State of New York, 140 A.D.2d 692, 529 N.Y.S.2d 22; Whitehead v. Centerville Fire Dist., 90 A.D.2d 655, 456 N.Y.S.2d 450; cf., Gagliardi v. New York City Hous. Auth., 88 A.D.2d 610, 450 N.Y.S.2d ...
  • Wolf v. State
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 31, 1988
    ...of the State was not only present at the accident scene but was involved in the collision itself ( see, Whitehead v. Centerville Fire Dist., 90 A.D.2d 655, 456 N.Y.S.2d 450; Matter of Ziecker v. Town of Orchard Park, 70 A.D.2d 422, 421 N.Y.S.2d 447, affd 51 N.Y.2d 957, 435 N.Y.S.2d 720, 416......
  • Continental Ins. Co. v. City of Rye
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 11, 1999
    ...Dutchess, 159 A.D.2d 706, 553 N.Y.S.2d 1012; cf., Wolf v. State of New York, 140 A.D.2d 692, 529 N.Y.S.2d 22; Whitehead v. Centerville Fire Dist., 90 A.D.2d 655, 456 N.Y.S.2d 450; Matter of Ziecker v. Town of Orchard Park, 70 A.D.2d 422, 421 N.Y.S.2d 447, affd. 51 N.Y.2d 957, 435 N.Y.S.2d 7......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT