Whitehead v. Kennedy

Decision Date10 April 1950
Docket NumberNo. 17038,17038
PartiesWHITEHEAD, Tax Commissioner, v. KENNEDY.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

A lease conveying the right for a period of four years to cut and box pine trees on described premises, for the purpose of extracting gum to be distilled into turpentine, is not subject to ad valorem tax.

T. E. Kennedy Jr., on August 7, 1948, filed a petition against the Tax Commissioner of Turner County, seeking to enjoin him from adding the sum of $9000 to Kennedy's ad valorem tax return for 1948. It was alleged that, after filing his tax return, the tax assessors of the county had added to his tax return the sum of $9000 as the value of certain turpentine leases held by Kennedy as grantee, and delivered the same to the Tax Commissioner, who is preparing to enter it upon the tax digest as tax due by Kennedy. It was alleged that the leases in question were not subject to tax.

By agreement the case was submitted to the judge without the intervention of a jury, upon the following agreed statement of facts: '(1) That the defendant is the qualified and acting Tax Commissioner of Turner County, Georgia. (2) That the plaintiff, within the time provided by law, made in the office of the defendant his tax returns for 1948, including all of his property, real and personal, except that he did not return any turpentine leases, although, as a matter of fact, he did hold certain rights to work pine trees for the purpose of extracting gum to be distilled for turpentine and resin. The leases so held only granted to him the right to cut and box pine trees on certain lands for the purpose of taking therefrom crude gum to be distilled into turpentine. These leases conveyed the right to work such trees for 4 years and granted no other rights in the land or timber. (3) The tax assessors of Turner County have added to plaintiff's such tax returns certain turpentine leases, and fixed their taxable value at $9000. (4) The land on which such timber grows was returned by the owners at their full taxable value, and no deduction was made because of the leases granted plaintiff.'

The trial judge granted an injunction, and the tax commissioner excepted.

Edwin A. Rogers, Ashburn, for plaintiff in error.

R. D. Smith, Tifton, for defendant in error.

ATKINSON, Presiding Justice (after stating the foregoing facts).

Code, § 92-101 provides: 'All real and personal property, whether owned by individuals or corporations,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Lease Words You Never Minded: Usufructs vs. Estates For Years
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • September 15, 2022
    ...a tenant is not, where there is a mere tenancy"). 23. Allright Parking, 244 Ga. at 385, 260 S.E.2d at 320 (citing Whitehead v. Kennedy, 206 Ga. 760, 761, 58 S.E.2d 832, 833 (1950)); see also Diversified Golf, 267 Ga. App. 8, 598 S.E.2d 791 (holding that the lessee took a usufruct under the ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Usufructs vs. Estates for Years
    • United States
    • State Bar of Georgia Georgia Bar Journal No. 26-5, April 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...a tenant is not, where there is a mere tenancy"). [16] Allright Parking, 244 Ga. at 385, 260 S.E.2d at 320 (citing Whitehead v. Kennedy, 206 Ga. 760, 761, 58 S.E.2d 832, 833 (1950)); see also Macon-Bibb Cty. Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Atl. Se. Airlines, 262 Ga. 119, 414 S.E.2d 635 (1992) (supp......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT