Whitehead v. State
Decision Date | 15 March 1911 |
Citation | 137 S.W. 356 |
Parties | WHITEHEAD v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Parker County; J. W. Patterson, Judge.
Hugh Whitehead was convicted of rape on a girl less than 14 years of age, and appeals. Affirmed.
The evidence of the prosecutrix and defendant was as follows:
Testimony of the Prosecutrix.
Lottie Whitehead, a witness called on behalf of the state, being duly sworn, examined in chief by Mr. Wilson, testified as follows:
Cross-examination by Mr. Martin: "I was 16 years old the 9th of last June. My father's name is R. N. Whitehead. I have a brother named Will Whitehead, and one named Jim Whitehead. Jim's wife's name is Ida. She is here. Jim is not here. He is at home in Johnson county. He is man grown. I have three brothers-in-law. One is named William Ponds, who is not here. I have not seen him in about six years. His wife has been living with us all the time he has been gone. He was in Oklahoma when I last heard from him. Hugh Whitehead is my brother-in-law, and so is Brace Upchurch, who lives in Hill county now. He has not been living with us the past year. My father is here as a witness. My father and I came here to visit Hugh and Ella the last of May, 1907, after school had been out a day or two. There were some entertainments after that, which I did not stay for. When I got back from that visit, the entertainments were over. My father and I came up here on Friday or Saturday. I did not swear before it was Friday, but I swore before it was Friday or Saturday. That was the only visit I ever made to Hugh while he lived here at Weatherford. I did not testify before that my father and I came up here and visited Hugh the first time at Smith's and stayed a day or two. I did not visit Hugh at I. E. Smith's place west of town about a mile; did not visit him there with my father. I don't know when they moved to Florence Patrick's place. I did not visit them and stay a few days until they moved to Florence Patrick's place in town. I don't recollect anything about it. If I visited them any more than I have stated, I don't remember about it. We came up here in 1907 but once. I visited Weatherford just once before I came here to court, and that time my father and Mr. Harris came with me. Harris is here as a witness. I am well acquainted with him. He came out and took dinner with Hugh while I was there, and my father went home that evening with Mr. Harris. Hugh at that time was working on a title farm near where he was living. I cannot state about what time my father and Harris left to go home that evening. It was Monday or Tuesday. It was Monday. He stayed two nights I am certain. I did not swear on the other trial that it was Sunday about sundown that defendant had intercourse with me, or between sundown and dark. I never swore it was Sunday, because father stayed here two nights. My father never told me he went home Saturday. I never swore Hugh had intercourse with me on Sunday. He did have intercourse with me along about sundown while his wife was at Beck's, down across the road in the hollow about 100 yards from their home. We could not talk between there and Beck's without hollering. I never talked with Mrs. Beck across there, and I don't remember hearing my sister do so. She has hollered over there a time or two. She would be on her gallery talking to Mrs. Beck on her gallery. I did not swear on the other trial that Ella went to Mrs. Beck's to get some coffee that evening that Hugh had intercourse with me. I never said she went over there to get coffee. I don't know what she went for. She was gone 15 or 20 minutes. I couldn't tell how long she had been gone when Hugh came to me. I never knew Hugh was there when she left. When I first discovered him, he came in the door. I had my day clothes on; had not undressed. I had a white dress on. The baby was on the bed asleep in the other room. I knew that because Ella told me to notice it when she left. I was lying down when she left. I got up and went in the room, and saw it lying on the bed. After I lay down on the bed, I never got up before Hugh came. When they was in the kitchen, I went in there, my head hurting me, and went in the room and looked on the bed, and seen it was all right, and lay down on the cot. The kitchen was towards the right from the room I slept in, and the big room was towards the left. My room was right off the side of it. The kitchen was further back. I never got up and went in the kitchen. I was sitting in the kitchen and came out and looked on the bed, and seen the baby was all right, and went in and lay down on the cot. I don't remember whether I was laying down or not before my sister left, nor where I was when she told me to watch the baby. I never lay down but once. I went from the kitchen in the big room and from there went and lay down. Defendant, the first thing he said to me, told me to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Miller v. State
...Martin v. State, 73 Tex. Cr. R. 546, 165 S. W. 579; Robertson v. State, 51 Tex. Cr. R. 493, 102 S. W. 1130; Whitehead v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 558, 137 S. W. 356; and a great many other cases. The fact, if so, that Zollie had been previously married, would be immaterial; for, if not appella......
-
Jaffe v. Deckard
...in the presence of the jury that the accused was its father (Snodgrass v. State, 36 Tex. Cr. R. 207, 36 S. W. 477; Whitehead v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 558, 137 S. W. 356), but intimated in Stracner v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. R. 89, 215 S. W. 305, that if the child had been kept in the courtroom o......
-
Dyer v. State
...42 Tex. 226; Anschicks v. State, 6 Tex. App. 524; Mayo v. State, 7 Tex. App. 347; Moore v. State, 20 Tex. App. 278; Whitehead v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 558, 137 S. W. 356; Hightower v. State, 65 Tex. Cr. R. 323, 143 S. W. 1168; Vanderberg v. State, 66 Tex. Cr. R. 583, 148 S. W. The contentio......
-
Monroe v. State
...case like the one before us this testimony would be inadmissible. Knowles v. State, 44 Tex. Cr. R. 325, 72 S. W. 398; Whitehead v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 567, 137 S. W. 356. The fourth bill of exceptions presents complaint of the refusal of appellant's motion for new trial based on the propo......