Whitehead v. State, 38318

Decision Date27 May 1960
Docket NumberNo. 38318,No. 2,38318,2
Citation101 Ga.App. 732,115 S.E.2d 429
PartiesHerschel WHITEHEAD v. STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

James W. Roberts, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

Richard Bell, Sol. Gen., Decatur, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

CARLISLE, Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted on the charge of selling liquor in a dry county. He made a motion for a new trial on the general grounds and on one special ground in which he complained of the refusal of the court to grant his motion for a mistrial. In this court he has expressly abandoned the general grounds and insists solely on the one special ground. The motion for a new trial merely states that counsel made a motion for a mistrial, which was overruled by the court, and nowhere therein is it stated upon what grounds counsel moved the court for a mistrial. The contentions of counsel as shown by this ground as to why a motion for a mistrial should have been granted do not appear to have been urged before trial court. This ground of the motion for a new trial is too defective and incomplete to present any question for decision, and the trial judge did not err in overruling it. Owens v. State, 32 Ga.App. 417, 418(2), 123 S.E. 919; Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 100 Ga.App. 217, 223(5), 110 S.E.2d 782.

Judgment affirmed.

GARDNER, P. J., and TOWNSEND and FRANKUM, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Cherry v. State, 22826
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1965
    ...219; Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 100 Ga.App. 217, 223(5), 110 S.E.2d 782; Whitehead v. State, 101 Ga.App., 732, 115 S.E.2d 429. 5. The fourth special ground of the motion alleges that during the progress of the trial the assistant solicitor made the......
  • Hudgins & Co. v. Chesterfield Laundry, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 24, 1964
    ... ... The report also disclosed that the State Highway Department had agreed not to demand possession of the condemned premises prior to April 1, ... See, in this connection, Whitaker v. Creedon, 99 Ga.App. 228(2), 108 S.E.2d 335; Whitehead v. State, 101 Ga.App. 732, 115 ... S.E.2d 429; Owens v. State, 32 Ga.App. 417(2), 123 S.E. 919 ... ...
  • Day v. Phillips, s. 40146
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 23, 1963
    ...to and a motion for mistrial made. It does not appear upon what grounds the motion was made. Under the decision in Whitehead v. State, 101 Ga.App. 732, 115 S.E.2d 429, and the cases there cited these grounds of the motions for new trial in each case are too defective to be passed upon. And ......
  • Shelton v. State, 40797
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 3, 1965
    ...919; Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 100 Ga.App. 217, 223(5), 110 S.E.2d 782.' Whitehead v. State, 101 Ga.App. 732, 115 S.E.2d 429. 4. Under the decision of the Supreme Court in Cooper v. State, 182 Ga. 42(2), 184 S.E. 716, 104 A.L.R. 1309, the trial co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT