Whitlock v. Michael, 17494
Decision Date | 10 July 1951 |
Docket Number | No. 17494,17494 |
Citation | 208 Ga. 229,65 S.E.2d 797 |
Parties | WHITLOCK et al. v. MICHAEL. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
O. R. Whitlock executed his will on February 25, 1944, and died during June of that year. The will was probated, and Mrs. Mary Hazeltine Whitlock, his widow, and Rufus E. Whitlock, his son, qualified as executrix and executor. The material parts of the will are:
The record shows, without any dispute, that Mrs. Whitlock occupied and had possession of the home place of the testator, rent free, from the date of his death on June 17, 1944, until the spring of 1947 when it was sold, at private sale, by her and Rufus E. Whitlock, and conveyed to the purchaser by a deed which they as such executrix and executor signed and which Mrs. Whitlock and all of the children of O. R. Whitlock also signed individually. As such executrix and executor, and Mrs. Whitlock and Rufus E. Whitlock, on May 10, 1947, used a part of the proceeds received from the sale of the testator's home-place in the purchase of a lot on Pike Street in the City of Lawrenceville, Georgia, taking title thereto in the name of 'Mary Hazeltine Whitlock and Rufus E. Whitlock, as executors of the estate of O. R. Whitlock, deceased,' and the balance was used by them in the construction of a dwelling-house on the lot purchased, which dwelling Mrs. Whitlock has since and now occupies. On June 22, 1949, an execution in favor of Mrs. Rosa Michael and against Mrs. Mary Hazeltine Whitlock and Mrs. Doris Golembiewski was levied on the Pike Street lot in the City of Lawrenceville, which Mrs. Whitlock and Rufus E. Whitlock had purchased on May 10, 1947, the officer's entry, as amended, reciting...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Reid
...A directed verdict is proper only when the evidence demands the verdict and no other verdict could be legally found. Whitlock v. Michael, 208 Ga. 229, 65 S.E.2d 797. 2. Questions of negligence are peculiarly for determination, not by the judge, but by a jury. Long Const. Co. v. Ryals, 102 G......
-
Jones v. Mayor, etc., of Athens
...A directed verdict is proper when the evidence demands the verdict and when no other verdict could be legally found. Whitlock v. Michael, 208 Ga. 229, 65 S.E.2d 797. In order for the direction of a verdict to be error, it must appear that there was some evidence which, with all reasonable d......
-
Bridges v. Elrod
...the proved facts, viewed from every possible legal point of view, can sustain no other finding than that directed.' Whitlock v. Michael, 208 Ga. 229, 65 S.E.2d 797, 799. While the evidence in the present case was in sharp conflict on many points, there was no evidence to sustain the father'......
-
Burger Barn, Inc. v. Young, 49195
...therefrom. Code Ann. § 105-401. 2. A directed verdict is proper only when all of the evidence demands the verdict. Whitlock v. Michael, 208 Ga. 229, 65 S.E.2d 797. 3. Questions of negligence, contributory negligence, cause and proximate cause, and whose negligence or what negligence constit......