Whitmire v. Whitmire, 16195
| Decision Date | 11 June 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 16195,16195 |
| Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
| Parties | Doris M. WHITMIRE v. Donald E. WHITMIRE. |
Syllabus by the Court
1. "Alimony may be awarded under W.Va.Code, 48-2-4(a)(7), against a 'faultless' party if 'principles of justice' so require, considering the financial needs of the parties and other factors listed in Code, 48-2-16." Syllabus Point 1, F.C. v. I.V.C., 171 W.Va. 458, 300 S.E.2d 99 (1982).
2. Syllabus Point 1, Peremba v. Peremba, 172 W.Va. 293, 304 S.E.2d 880 (1983).
William E. Murray, McKittrick & Murray, St. Albans, for appellant.
Leonard H. Higgins, Poffenbarger & Higgins, Charleston, for appellee.
This is an appeal by Doris M. Whitmire from a final divorce order entered by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County which granted her a divorce based on voluntary separation but denied her alimony. She contends that she was entitled to alimony, and we agree.
The parties to this proceeding were married on May 16, 1957. They lived together until June 16, 1981. At the time of the separation in 1981, the appellant was forty-two years old. During most of her years of marriage, she worked in the home as a mother. The parties had one adopted child who was eighteen at the time of the divorce proceedings. For a short period in the earlier years of marriage, the appellant had been employed in a restaurant. She testified that she was no longer able to find work in that field because of her age. Her husband, an independent contractor, operated a contracting and excavating business in conjunction with his brother.
At the time of the divorce proceedings, the parties jointly owned a parcel of improved real estate worth approximately $100,000. They also jointly owned twenty acres in Pennsylvania, worth approximately $10,000. Mrs. Whitmire had no substantial assets other than her joint interests in the real property. Donald E. Whitmire, on the other hand, owned a one-half interest in a partnership worth approximately $85,000, according to the testimony of the parties' son. Donald E. Whitmire's income consisted of his portion of the profits of the partnership, which in the year 1980 amounted to $8,241.26.
The divorce commissioner's findings, which were adopted by the circuit court, disclosed a history of marital bickering and discord. Mrs. Whitmire was upset over some of the living conditions in the home and the lack of money for living expenses and complained that her husband was unduly generous in giving money to his brother who was in the partnership.
Much of the commissioner's report and findings of inequitable conduct on the part of Mrs. Whitmire evolved from a trip in September of 1981 that she made to Canaan Valley with her nephew, a Keith McClannahan, who was attending a VFW meeting at Canaan Valley. Her husband had consented to the trip, but apparently followed her. Mr. Whitmire observed Mr. McClannahan coming out of Mrs. Whitmire's motel room. Apparently, both Mr. McClannahan and Mrs. Whitmire also associated with a Mr. Reed who had driven with McClannahan to the meeting and was a friend of both. There was no evidence of any sexual impropriety on this occasion. Testimony was also introduced that in the fall of 1980, Mrs. Whitmire and her sister had gone clogging with Mr. Reed and that on one occasion, Mrs. Whitmire was seen kissing Mr. Reed.
The divorce commissioner's finding was that Mrs. Whitmire was guilty of inequitable conduct. The divorce commissioner noted that F.C. v. I.V.C., 171 W.Va. 458, 300 S.E.2d 99 (1982), had modified Dyer v. Tsapis, 162 W.Va. 289, 249 S.E.2d 509 (1978), by permitting an award of alimony against a faultless party where the divorce is awarded on grounds of voluntary separation. As stated in Syllabus Point 1 of F.C. v. I.V.C.:
"Alimony may be awarded under W.Va.Code, 48-2-4(a)(7), against a 'faultless' party if 'principles of justice' so require, considering the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
M.S.P. v. P.E.P.
...of the marriage, the conduct must have occurred before the suit to dissolve the marriage has been filed." Whitmire v. Whitmire, 175 W.Va. 461, 462, 334 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1985). In order for conduct which occurred prior to the divorce suit to constitute a ground for the divorce, the injured p......
-
Goddard v. Goddard, 16342
...of the marriage." See also syl. pt. 2, Nutter v. Nutter, 174 W.Va. 398, 327 S.E.2d 160 (1985); syl. pt. 2, Whitmire v. Whitmire, 175 W.Va. 461, 334 S.E.2d 598 (1985). Relying on F.C. v. I.V.C., 171 W.Va.458, 300 S.E.2d 99 (1982), we stressed in Peremba that "economic means and needs of the ......
-
Hillberry v. Hillberry
...of the Appellee to have been sufficiently proven to serve as the grounds for granting a divorce. Pursuant to Whitmire v. Whitmire, 175 W.Va. 461, 462, 334 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1985), the adulterous conduct, in order to be pursued as a cause of dissolution or a factor in alimony, must have occur......