Whittington v. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co.

Decision Date02 June 1920
Docket Number506.
PartiesWHITTINGTON v. VIRGINIA IRON, COAL & COKE CO.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Wilkes County; Long, Judge.

Action by J. L. Whittington, administrator, against the Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Company. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals. No error.

Negligence may be proven by circumstantial evidence; and, if the facts proved render it probable that defendant violated its duty it is for the jury to decide.

This action is for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff's intestate while working in defendant company's coal mine, on Tom's Creek, Va., September 8, 1917.

The allegation of negligence relied on by the plaintiff is that defendant did not furnish a reasonably safe place to work. The intestate was employed by defendant company as a driver of a mule team in its mines. The teams are hitched to little cars that run on tracks, similar to ordinary railroad tracks laid along the tunnels, or entries, that lead into the mines. The rails, laid on cross-ties, are 44 inches apart. The mules are hitched to the car tandem, or "spike fashion," and the rear mule walks about 6 feet in front of the car being hitched by means of what is called a "tail chain." The mules walk in the middle of the track between the rails. The cars are low, and project over the rails on each side from 12 to 18 inches. Against the sides, or ribs, of the entries are piled pieces of slate, small lumps of coal, and other rubbish; in miners' parlance called "gob."

The evidence to prove negligence was largely circumstantial, as no one saw the intestate at the time he was killed.

Russell Anderson, who was nearest to him, testified among other things as follows:

"I was working for defendant company at Bondtown, Va., September 8, 1917, at time John Allen Whittington was killed, and knew him, but not very well; I had been there only two or three months. John Allen Whittington was working for defendant company at the time he was killed in what is known as entry No. 11, Swansea mine, at Bondtown, Va. He was driving two mules pulling cars from the rooms. These cars would hold about four tons of coal. On September 8, Whittington was working in West Swansea, and was on 11 West at the time he was injured, and that he was with him. Whittington was pulling coal for another driver on 11 West. He was driving two mules, one hitched in front of the other, spike fashion. Witness knew the mules Whittington was driving, and they were gentle with reference to their working qualities. The lead mule was balky sometimes. At the time Whittington was injured witness was helping a fellow break a mule. That he was about two car lengths from Whittington when he was injured, and a car length is about 7 feet. That the injury occurred about as follows: We coupled up the load and started out. A piece of slate slid down off the gob pile. I got off and threw it back, and when I got on the car I did not see him anywhere. I hollowed at John, and he did not answer, and then I heard him groan. Neither of the mules balked at the time of the injury. The mules had not stopped. Whittington was striking the lead mules across the back with a strap. I don't know why. On September 8, at the time Whittington was injured in entry No. 11, slate and gob stuff was on the outside of the rail stacked up like a wall; ties, props and things like that were lying across the road; slate piled up along the road; could not pass a car in some places; had to climb over; do not know that the track had been recently relaid in this entry.
Whittington died from the injuries. When the mules are walking along in the middle of the track, as they were on this occasion, there is two or 3 feet open space along by the side of the mule and the rail, and all that is kept clear in order that the cars will not wreck. Don't know why the props along the side of the entry; to hold the slate up I guess; laying along the road; sticking out and laying out everywhere--slate piled around there; props were along the side of entry, two props where he was killed. The two props which look like they had been set for the purpose of putting a collar on one time; had some slate or gob around them down next to the bottom just about as high as the car is; had to climb over the top to see what was the matter."

S. M. Mullins testified:

"The entry was near the point where he was injured in pretty bad condition. They had some slate there, some slack and some rubbish timber, rotten timber, little old rotten timber, something like rotten timber anyway, maybe two or three pieces there. The slate was on the side of the track, on the right-hand side. I never noticed the left-hand side of the track; the right side, the brake side, was the gob and some timbers. There was not sufficient room along the entry where the deceased was injured for him to have walked between the outside of the rail and the walls of the entry. The entry in order for a driver to discharge his duties in safety should be clear for him to get off to catch the brake if something should happen, for him to work in safe condition between the car and the rib. The deceased was lying on his face and belly under the car; his head was closer to the right-hand rail as you go up than to the left-hand rail; his head was in the direction of the rear of the trip, and his feet towards the mules. The entry should be in good shape that the driver could get off, set his brake if something should happen, the mules fall down or something happen, to keep from killing the mule, and that is for the protection of the mules. On a level track where the grade is practically level and the cars will not run without being pulled and the driver's place is on the front end of the car, I would want the side of the track outside of the rail to be clear. It looks like it should be clear. Sometimes if the track is level you want to set the brake, provided you want to hook the mule up for something to keep the mule from pulling the car."

W. W. Nelton testified:

"The entry at the place where we found him in the car was pretty well gobbed up, slate and gob on each side of the car; there was no room for a person to have walked between the outside rail and the rib; there was slate and dirt and a few rotten timbers. I have worked off and on in the mines for the last 12 years. In order that the driver may perform his duties with ordinary safety I should think the entry should be clear, should be clean between the rib and rails along so that if an accident should happen you could have room to get in the clear. There was a space of 12 or 14 inches on either side of the rail that was free of gob."

A. B. Baldwin testified:

"The condition of that entry at that time at the place we found him under the car was very bad, in very bad shape. The entry of the heading had
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Lawrence v. Yadkin River Power Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 9 Diciembre 1925
    ... ... and of its defects, the insulator, made of iron, porcelain, ... and cement, burst; that its broken parts, ... Co., 190 N.C. 292, ... 129 S.E. 810; Whittington v. Iron Co., 179 N.C. 647, ... 103 S.E. 395; State v ... ...
  • Dickerson v. Norfolk-Southern R. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 21 Octubre 1925
    ... ... It was equipped with a spark ... arrester. Green new coal burned in an engine causes black ...          Sam ... origin of the fire; this is not sufficient. Whittington ... v. Iron Co., 179 N.C. 647, 103 S.E. 395; State v ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT