Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. McAbee
Decision Date | 08 July 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 12176.) |
Citation | 21 S.W.2d 97 |
Parties | WICHITA FALLS TRACTION CO. v. McABEE et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Wichita County; P. A. Martin, Judge.
Action by Mrs. J. H. McAbee and husband against the Wichita Falls Traction Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
W. H. Lipscomb, of Fort Worth, and Wm. N. Bonner and Virgil Childress, both of Wichita Falls, for appellant.
Bullington, Boone, Humphrey & King, of Wichita Falls, for appellees.
Plaintiff Mrs. J. H. McAbee, joined pro forma by her husband, J. H. McAbee, filed suit in the district court of Wichita county against the Wichita Falls Traction Company for damages, alleged to have occurred in May, 1928. She alleged that on the night of May 10, 1928, on account of the stormy weather, she left her home and drove in a Ford automobile, with her nephew, some 14 years old, to the home of her sister-in-law, Mrs. Mike Benson, at 1804 Ninth street; that she stayed there until about 9:30 or 10 o'clock that night; that at said time and place, as alleged in her original petition, she "backed her automobile out of a driveway at No. 1804 on said street with the intention of driving in an easterly direction along Ninth street; that she backed said car out into said Ninth street and upon and across the said street car track when without any fault or negligence on her part the motor of said automobile stopped, leaving said car standing diagonally across said track; that at about the time the said automobile stopped as aforesaid the plaintiff observed one of the defendant's street cars approaching from the rear at a very rapid rate of speed; at about the same time the motorman of said street car having already observed her automobile standing upon said track began ringing the bell of said street car as a warning to her to get her said automobile off the track; that the plaintiff immediately upon finding said motor had stopped undertook to start the same and used every means at her command in an effort to start said car, but owing to the fact that it was a cold wet night the motor of said automobile was sluggish and the plaintiff was unable to start the same immediately; that the defendant's employee in charge of said street car failed and neglected to check the speed of said car but continued at a rapid and reckless rate of speed, striking the plaintiff's automobile in such a manner and with such great force as to produce the injuries hereinafter fully set out."
Plaintiff alleged that she was injured in her head, neck, shoulders, back, and arms, and that she sustained an injury to her chest by being thrown against the steering wheel of the automobile, and that she was greatly frightened, and that her nervous system was shocked. In her original petition she prayed for damages in the sum of $3,000. In her amended petition, filed September 24, 1928, some four months later, she amplified the allegations of defendant's negligence, of her injuries, and alleged that by reason of said injuries she was permanently injured, and prayed for $15,000 damages.
The cause came on for trial, and the case was submitted to a jury on special issues. The trial court, after defining "negligence," "contributory negligence," and "proximate cause," submitted the case on the following special issues:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Justiss v. Naquin
...Mo. 1103, 19 S.W.2d 707, 65 A.L.R. 129; Standard Oil v. United States, 4 Cir., 264 F. 66, 12 A.L.R. 1404; (2) Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. McAbee, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 97, par. 7; Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Mortensen, 27 Tex.Civ.App. 106, 66 S.W. 99, error denied; 65 C.J., page 1203; Carru......
-
Malone v. City of Plainview, 5005.
...R. Co. v. Adams, Tex.Civ.App., 27 S.W.2d 331; Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Weed, Tex.Com.App., 300 S.W. 41; Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. McAbee, Tex.Civ. App., 21 S.W.2d 97; Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Breadow, et al., 90 Tex. 26, 36 S.W. Appellants contend that Bolles was guilty of numerous a......
-
Brazos River Gas Co. v. McGarr
...It does not cite, nor have we been able to find, any case that has ever been reversed for such error. In Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. McAbee, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 97, 101, writ dis., such action was held not to be reversible error. Under the circumstances here disclosed, it is inconceiv......
-
Ruggles v. John Deere Plow Co.
...be shown that he discovered it in time to avoid the injury by the use of means available to him at the time. Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. McAbee, Tex.Civ.App., 21 S.W.2d 97; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Breadow et al., 90 Tex. 26, 36 S.W. 410, 411; Northern Texas Traction Co. v. Singer, Tex.Civ.Ap......