Wickliffe v. Farmers' Bank of Frankfort
Decision Date | 02 February 1911 |
Citation | 133 S.W. 966,142 Ky. 35 |
Parties | WICKLIFFE et al. v. FARMERS' BANK OF FRANKFORT. [d] |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Ballard County.
Action by the Farmers' Bank of Frankfort against J. B. Wickliffe and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
J. B. Wickliffe, for appellants.
Corbett & White and James H. Polsgrove, for appellee.
O'REAR, J.
In an action by appellee against appellants upon a bond of indemnity against loss of certain deposits made by appellee in the Farmers' Bank of Wickliffe, the judgment was for appellee.
It appears that the papers in the case were lost. Judgment was rendered at the April term, 1910, of the Ballard circuit court. At the August term, 1910, the appellants filed a petition in the same case for a new trial, and gave notice that they would apply to have the judgment rendered in April set aside. The circuit court refused to grant the new trial. The appeal is from the first judgment. The original papers have not yet been found, so far as the record before us shows, nor have they been supplied by a substituted record. It is therefore impossible for us to know what was in the former record. The presumption is it would sustain the judgment. The circuit court had not jurisdiction at a subsequent term to set aside the judgment on the ground that it was erroneous, or because the proceedings were irregular. After the term those matters could be inquired into and corrected by this court only upon an appeal based upon the original record, or such as might be legally substituted for it by the Ballard circuit court. Upon the record before us there does not appear any error.
Judgment affirmed.
---------
Notes:
[d] Rehearing denied March 7, 1911.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prewitt v. Wilborn
... ... 444] ... Edward ... C. O'Rear, of Frankfort, S. Monroe Nickell, of Hazard, ... and H. R. Prewitt, of Mt. Sterling, ... 689, 126 S.W. 358, ... Ann.Cas. 1912A, 457; Huffaker v. National Bank, 13 ... Bush, 644. Hence an appellant, if he would secure a reversal ... Monarch, 32 S.W. 1083, 17 Ky. Law Rep ... 893; Farmers' Bank v. Farmers' Bank, 147 Ky ... 766, 145 S.W. 746; Wickliffe v ... ...
-
Foreman v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
... ... 271, 32 Ky. Law Rep ... 884, 129 Am. St. Rep. 295; Tanner v. Wickliffe Coal ... Co., 108 S.W. 351, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 1304; Nicholas v ... Abadie ... ...
-
Skinner v. Morrow
...241 Ky. 839, 45 S.W.2d 463. A judgment cannot be set aside under CR 60.02 for mere procedural irregularities. Wickliffe v. Farmers' Bank of Frankfort, 142 Ky. 35, 133 S.W. 966. Mrs. Skinner's motion here is the equivalent of a collateral attack upon the judgment, and it is a universal rule ......
-
Faulkner v. Faulkner
...rendered at a former term on the ground that it was erroneous or that the proceedings were irregular. Wickliffe et al. v. Farmers' Bank of Frankfort, 142 Ky. 35, 133 S.W. 966. Section 368 of the Civil Code of Practice defines a judgment as "a final determination of a right of a party in an ......