Wickliffe v. Farmers' Bank of Frankfort

Decision Date02 February 1911
Citation133 S.W. 966,142 Ky. 35
PartiesWICKLIFFE et al. v. FARMERS' BANK OF FRANKFORT. [d]
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Ballard County.

Action by the Farmers' Bank of Frankfort against J. B. Wickliffe and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

J. B. Wickliffe, for appellants.

Corbett & White and James H. Polsgrove, for appellee.

O'REAR, J.

In an action by appellee against appellants upon a bond of indemnity against loss of certain deposits made by appellee in the Farmers' Bank of Wickliffe, the judgment was for appellee.

It appears that the papers in the case were lost. Judgment was rendered at the April term, 1910, of the Ballard circuit court. At the August term, 1910, the appellants filed a petition in the same case for a new trial, and gave notice that they would apply to have the judgment rendered in April set aside. The circuit court refused to grant the new trial. The appeal is from the first judgment. The original papers have not yet been found, so far as the record before us shows, nor have they been supplied by a substituted record. It is therefore impossible for us to know what was in the former record. The presumption is it would sustain the judgment. The circuit court had not jurisdiction at a subsequent term to set aside the judgment on the ground that it was erroneous, or because the proceedings were irregular. After the term those matters could be inquired into and corrected by this court only upon an appeal based upon the original record, or such as might be legally substituted for it by the Ballard circuit court. Upon the record before us there does not appear any error.

Judgment affirmed.

---------

Notes:

[d] Rehearing denied March 7, 1911.

---------

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Prewitt v. Wilborn
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 28 Marzo 1919
    ... ... 444] ...          Edward ... C. O'Rear, of Frankfort, S. Monroe Nickell, of Hazard, ... and H. R. Prewitt, of Mt. Sterling, ... 689, 126 S.W. 358, ... Ann.Cas. 1912A, 457; Huffaker v. National Bank, 13 ... Bush, 644. Hence an appellant, if he would secure a reversal ... Monarch, 32 S.W. 1083, 17 Ky. Law Rep ... 893; Farmers' Bank v. Farmers' Bank, 147 Ky ... 766, 145 S.W. 746; Wickliffe v ... ...
  • Foreman v. Louisville & N.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 3 Febrero 1911
    ... ... 271, 32 Ky. Law Rep ... 884, 129 Am. St. Rep. 295; Tanner v. Wickliffe Coal ... Co., 108 S.W. 351, 32 Ky. Law Rep. 1304; Nicholas v ... Abadie ... ...
  • Skinner v. Morrow
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 28 Noviembre 1958
    ...241 Ky. 839, 45 S.W.2d 463. A judgment cannot be set aside under CR 60.02 for mere procedural irregularities. Wickliffe v. Farmers' Bank of Frankfort, 142 Ky. 35, 133 S.W. 966. Mrs. Skinner's motion here is the equivalent of a collateral attack upon the judgment, and it is a universal rule ......
  • Faulkner v. Faulkner
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 19 Noviembre 1937
    ...rendered at a former term on the ground that it was erroneous or that the proceedings were irregular. Wickliffe et al. v. Farmers' Bank of Frankfort, 142 Ky. 35, 133 S.W. 966. Section 368 of the Civil Code of Practice defines a judgment as "a final determination of a right of a party in an ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT