Wiebe v. State, 5D14–544.
Decision Date | 24 October 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 5D14–544.,5D14–544. |
Citation | 149 So.3d 729 |
Parties | Steven J. WIEBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Steven J. Wiebe, Bristol, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Appellant, Steven Wiebe, appeals the trial court's summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion for correction of jail credit. We reverse and remand.
In 2000, Wiebe was charged with two counts of sexual battery on a child under twelve years of age. In 2002, the State nolle prossed those charges after unsuccessfully appealing an order suppressing a statement Wiebe made to law enforcement. Wiebe had been incarcerated awaiting trial, but he was released after the charges were dropped.
Eight years later, the State reopened Wiebe's case during the course of a new investigation. Charges were refiled, and Wiebe entered a no-contest plea to two counts of sexual battery on a person under twelve years of age. According to Wiebe, those were the same charges that he faced in 2000.1 The trial court sentenced him as a sexual predator to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. That judgment and sentence was affirmed on appeal. See Wiebe v. State, 111 So.3d 897 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013). The issue presented here is whether Wiebe is entitled to credit for the time that he spent in jail awaiting trial in 2000.
Currently, life means life, and granting Wiebe additional credit for time served will have no practical effect on his sentence. But we recognize that Florida's sentencing laws are subject to change, and we do not know how the Legislature might amend Florida's sentencing scheme in the future.2
Section 921.161, Florida Statutes, provides that defendants are entitled to credit for time served:
A sentence of imprisonment shall not begin to run before the date it is imposed, but the court imposing a sentence shall allow a defendant credit for all of the time she or he spent in the county jail before sentence. The credit must be for a specified period of time and shall be provided for in the sentence.
§ 921.161(1), Fla. Stat. (2013). And “[t]he fact that the sentence is for life does not diminish the requirement to allow credit for time served.” Lyttle v. State, 352 So.2d 942, 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) (citation omitted). The State has not cited any authority for the proposition that if the State nolle prosses a charge and later refiles, which is not uncommon, a defendant held on that charge pending trial loses the right to credit for time served. Rather, the cases relied upon by the State hold that defendants are not entitled to credit for time served for different offenses committed on...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Judgment and sentence
...Fact that defendant is sentenced to life imprisonment does not diminish requirement to allow credit for time served. Wiebe v. State, 149 So.3d 729 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) Trial court that mistakenly awarded defendant almost 500 days of jail time credit could correct the amount of jail time cred......
-
Post-conviction relief
...Fact that defendant is sentenced to life imprisonment does not diminish requirement to allow credit for time served. Wiebe v. State, 149 So.3d 729 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) The court errs in granting a 3.800(a) motion filed while the direct appeal of the conviction is pending. The only method to ......