Wiece v. Marbut
Decision Date | 31 January 1876 |
Parties | John Wiece, plaintiff in error. v. Milly C. Marbut et al.,defendants in error. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Dower. Title. Estoppel. Before Judge Knight. Fannin Superior Court. October Term, 1875.
Reported in the decision.
J. A. Jervis; John S. Fain; Marshall L. Smith; Thomas F. Greer, for defendants.
This was an application for dower in a lot of land in Fannin county, the applicant claiming the same as the widow of A. T. Churchhill, deceased. The right of the applicant to dower in the land was contested, and on the trial of that issue the jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict against the widow's right to dower in the land. Whereupon she made a motion for a new trial, on the several grounds stated therein, which was granted by the court, and the contestant excepted.
*The main question in the case was whether Churchhill, the husband of the applicant for dower, was seized and possessed of the land at the time of his death. It appears from the evidence in the record that Churchhill died in 1858 or in 1859, probably in 1858. It also appears from the evidence that Ashworth obtained a judgment against Churchhill in May, 1858, for $545 00, principal, besides interest thereon, upon which an execution issued on the 20th of May, 1858. This execution was levied on the land by the sheriff of Fannin county, on the 18th of June, 1858, as the property of the defendant, the sheriff reciting in his levy that he had given the defendant in possession notice thereof. The sale of the land under this levy appears to have been suspended by the interposition of a claim, as is shown by the entry of the sheriff on the execution. It further appears that on the 29th of May, 1867, the execution was again levied on the land by the sheriff, and sold on the 6th of July. 1867, and was purchased by Wiece, the contestant, the sheriff making him a deed thereto, in which it is recited that the land was seized and sold as the property of the defendant, Churchhill. There was evidence going to show that Churchhill never was in possession of the land, and there was parol evidence (admitted without objection) going to show that Churchhill had sold the land in his lifetime to Davis, and that Davis rented the land and received the rent therefor, but there was no evidence that Churchhill sold the land after the date of the judgment. There was no paper title...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Exch. Bank v. Graniteville Mfg. Co.
...703; Harpes v. Harpes, 62 Ga. 394; Lockhart v. Railroad, 73 Ga. 472; Scott v. Singer, 54 Ga. 689; Miller v. Surls, 19 Ga. 333; Wiece v. Marbut, 55 Ga. 613; Griffin v. Sheffield, 77 Dec. 649; Griffin v. Sheffield, 38 Miss. 359; Code, § 2111; Warner v. Martin, 11 How. 225, 226; Daubigny v. Du......
-
Nat'l Exch. Bank Of Augusta v. Gbaniteville Manuf'g Co
...703; Harpes v. Harpes, 62 Ga. 394; Lockhart v. Railroad, 73 Ga. 472; Scott v. Singer, 54 Ga. 689; Miller v. Surls, 19 Ga. 333; Wiece v. Mar-but, 55 Ga. 613; Griffin v. Sheffield, 77 Amer. Dec. 649; Griffin v. Sheffield, 38 Miss. 359; Code, § 2111; Warner v. Martin, 11 How. 225, 226; Daubign......
-
Ellis v. Kyger
...v. Bruere, 5 N. J. L. 865; Randolph v. Doss, 3 Han. [Miss.] 205; Gayle v. Price, 5 Rich. [S. C.] 525; May v. Tillman, 1 Mich. 262; Weice v. Morburt, 55 Ga. 613; Wedge Moore, 6 Cush. 8; Coakley v. Perry, 3 O. St. 347; Dashiel v. Collier, 4 J. J. Marsh. 601; Davis v. O'Ferrall, 4 G. Greer [Ia......
- Daniels v. The Intendant