Wiedeman v. St. Louis Taxicab Co.
| Decision Date | 07 April 1914 |
| Citation | 165 S.W. 1106,182 Mo. App. 530 |
| Parties | WIEDEMAN v. ST. LOUIS TAXICAB CO. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; W. B. Homer, Judge.
Action by Lulu Wiedeman, an infant, by O. W. Hammer, her next friend, against the St. Louis Taxicab Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Collins & Chappell, of St. Louis, for appellant. Earl M. Pirkey, of St. Louis, for respondent.
This cause has been submitted here upon a stipulation of counsel, wherein it was stipulated and agreed that this appeal should abide the determination of the case of Fred Wiedeman v. St. Louis Taxicab Company (No. 13,564 of this court) 165 S. W. 1105, and that the same order or judgment of this court should be entered herein as in the said case just referred to. Inasmuch as we have entered an order affirming the judgment in said case of Fred Wiedeman v. St. Louis Taxicab Co., supra, we therefore, pursuant to the terms of said stipulation, affirm the judgment herein.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Steffen v. S.W. Bell Tel. Co.
...largely within the discretion of the trial court. Hey v. Hinerman, 208 Mo. App. 691; Turnbow v. Dunham, 197 S.W. 106; Wademan v. St. L. Taxicab Co., 182 Mo. App. 530; Freary v. Met. St. Ry., 162 Mo. 97; Soltesz v. Belz Prov. Co., 260 S.W. 590. (12) This instruction defined "burden of proof"......
-
Steffen v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
... ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis"; Hon. William H ... Killoren , Judge ... ... Affirmed ... \xC2" ... 691; ... Turnbow v. Dunham, 197 S.W. 106; Wademan v. St ... L. Taxicab Co., 182 Mo.App. 530; Freary v. Met. St ... Ry., 162 Mo. 97; Soltesz v. Belz Prov. Co., 260 ... ...
-
Nelson v. C. Heinz Stove Co.
... ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis; Hon. Edwin G ... Ossing, Judge ... ... Affirmed ... Mathieson, 261 S.W. 335; Hely v. Hinderman, 208 ... Mo.App. 691; Wiederman v. Taxicab Co., 182 Mo.App ... 530; Clark v. Engineering Co., 263 S.W. 500; Merton ... v. Coffin Co., 232 ... ...
-
Nelson v. C. Heinz Stove Co.
...no substantial ground for complaint. State ex rel. Larson v. Mathieson, 261 S.W. 335; Hely v. Hinderman, 208 Mo. App. 691; Wiederman v. Taxicab Co., 182 Mo. App. 530; Clark v. Engineering Co., 263 S.W. 500; Merton v. Coffin Co., 232 S.W. ATWOOD, J. Appellant, Leo Nelson, while an employee o......