Wilcox v. Arnold

Decision Date03 January 1895
Citation39 N.E. 414,162 Mass. 577
PartiesWILCOX et al. v. ARNOLD et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

John J. Higgins, for plaintiffs.

D.L. Montague, for defendants.

FIELD, C.J.

The evidence was sufficient to warrant the finding of the court. It was competent for the court to infer from all the evidence that the defendants, who were present at the class meeting at which it was voted to publish a volume to be called "The Brown and Blue," either voted to publish the volume or assented to the vote. This is also true of the vote by which Arnold was elected "business manager of the publication." The contract made by Arnold was apparently within the scope of his employment; at least the court so find. Newell v. Borden, 128 Mass. 31; Ray v. Powers, 134 Mass. 22. Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Farm & Home Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Missouri v. Armstrong
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 10, 1935
    ... ... v. 5 Mo.App. 279; Richmond v. Judy, 6 Mo.App. 465; ... Riffe v. Proctor, 99 Mo.App. 601; Ray v ... Powers, 134 Mass. 22; Wilcox v. Arnold, 162 ... Mass. 577, 39 N.E. 414; Davison v. Holden, 55 Conn ... 103, 3 Am. St. Rep. 40; Evans v. Lily & Co., 95 ... Miss. 58, 48 ... ...
  • Continental Supply Co. v. Adams
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • January 17, 1925
    ...v. Tilton, 64 Iowa, 220, 52 Am. Rep. 436, 19 N. W. 911; Davison v. Holden, 55 Conn. 103, 3 Am. St. Rep. 40, 10 Atl. 515; Willcox v. Arnold, 162 Mass. 577, 39 N. E. 414." What was there said applies to cases like this with added force, by reason of the fact that the association is organized ......
  • Members of Bakery & Confectionery Workers Union v. Hall Baking Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 5, 1946
    ...though not named but merely described by the use of a trade or partnership or association name, or otherwise. Willcox v. Arnold, 162 Mass. 577, 39 N.E. 414;William Gilligan Co. v. Casey, 205 Mass. 26, 31, 91 N.E. 124;Sweetman v. Berrows, 263 Mass. 349, 355, 161 N.E. 272, 62 A.L.R. 311;Farnu......
  • Members of Bakery & Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 458 v. Hall Baking Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 5, 1946
    ...contractually though not named but merely described by the use of a trade or partnership or association name, or otherwise. Willcox v. Arnold, 162 Mass. 577 . William Gilligan Co. v. Casey, 205 Mass. 26 , 31. Sweetman v. Barrows, 263 Mass. 349, 355. Farnum v. Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. 281......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT