Wilcoxson v. McBride
| Decision Date | 31 October 1856 |
| Citation | Wilcoxson v. McBride, 23 Mo. 404 (Mo. 1856) |
| Parties | WILCOXSON et al., Appellants, v. MCBRIDE, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. A bill of exceptions can not be allowed and signed at a term subsequent to that at which the trial is had without the consent of the opposite party.
Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court.
A motion was made in this cause in the Supreme Court by respondent's counsel to strike out the bill of exceptions on the ground that it was allowed and signed out of time. It appears that judgment was rendered November 18th, 1854, at the November term of the Monroe Circuit Court; that a motion for a new trial was overruled November 20th; that on the 21st of November, 1854, leave was, on motion, granted to plaintiffs to file their bill of exceptions at the next term of the court; that on the 18th day of June, 1855, during the June term, leave was again granted to plaintiffs to file their bill of exceptions at the next succeeding term of the court. No consent of the defendant appears to have been given to the granting of time to plaintiff. On the 17th day of November, 1855, during the November term, there was made the following entry: “Now at this day came the plaintiffs, by their attorneys, and on their motion leave is granted them to file herein their bill of exceptions, to the filing of which said bill of exceptions the defendant, by his attorney, objects; and the court, after hearing the said objections and the argument of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ruffner v. Hill
...3 A. K. Mar. 360; 4 Bush. 499; 12 Smede & M. 111; 10 Mo. 156; 17 N. J. L. 291; 22 N. J. L. 699; 26 N. J. L. 463; 19 Ohio 426; 6 O. St. 12; 23 Mo. 404; 25 Mo. 3 Sneed (Tenn.) 77; 16 How. 4; 14 W.Va. 157; 1 H. & M. 25; 9 Johns. 78; 3 John. 139; 12 Gratt. 53; 15 W.Va. 323; 13 W.Va. 202; 4 Minn......
-
Ruffner v. Hill et al
...3 A. K. Mar. 360; 4 Bush. 499; 12 Smede & M. Ill; 10 Mo. 156; 17 N. J. L. 291; 22 N. J. L. 699; 26 N J. L. 463; 19 Ohio 426; 6 O. St, 12; 23 Mo. 404; 25 Mo. 327; 3 Sneed (Tenn.) 77; 16 How. 4; 14 W. Va. 157; 1 H. & M. 25; 9 Johns. 78; 3 John. 139; 12 Gratt. 53; 15 W. Va. 323; 13 W. Va 202; ......
-
Mentzing v. Pacific R.R. Co.
...W. E. Sheffield, for Respondent, cited: Blankenship vs. North Mo. R. R. Co., 48 Mo. 376; Ellis vs. Andrews, 25 Mo. 327; Wilcoxson vs. McBride, 23 Mo. 404; Diepenbrock vs. Shaw, 21 Mo. 122; Sutter vs. Street, 21 Mo. 157; State vs. McO'Blenis, 21 Mo. 272. SHERWOOD, Judge, delivered the opinio......
- Henderson v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis