Wile v. McGoldrick
| Decision Date | 21 June 1955 |
| Citation | 141 N.Y.S.2d 874,286 A.D. 826 |
| Parties | Application of Max WILE, individually and as Chairman of the Tenants' Committee, representing various tenants in the Hotel Olcott, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Joseph D. McGOLDRICK, State Rent Administrator, and Hotel Olcott, Ben J. Slutsky and Julius Slutsky, Landlords, Respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
W. T. Kohn, New York City, for appellants.
M. G. Levine, J. B. Ward, New York City, for respondents.
Before PECK, P. J., and COHN, BREITEL and RABIN, JJ.
There is no justification for disturbing the valuation of the property as now found by the State Rent Administrator since there was ample basis for such a finding. The Administrator in determining what amount of rent would be required to afford the landlords a proper return has arrived at a figure which is well in excess of the 15% maximum increase allowable. That finding is sustained by the record. Order unanimously affirmed with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Order filed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
I.L.F.Y. Co. v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission
... ... While the 1953 statute was in effect, the administrative practice (confirmed by court decisions; see, for instance, Wile v. McGoldrick, 286 App.Div. 826, 141 N.Y.S.2d 874, motion for leave to appeal denied 309 N.Y. 1033, 130 N.E.2d 750) was to use the purchase price as ... ...
-
Ackerman v. Weaver
... ... It does not intend them to benefit from an advantageous arrangement which the owner makes with a lessee (Wile v. McGoldrick, 286 App.Div. 826, 141 N.Y.S.2d 874, motion for leave to appeal denied 309 N.Y. 1033, 130 N.E.2d 750). We find no statutory ... ...
- Wile v. McGoldrick