Wiles v. Mullinax, 603
Decision Date | 25 May 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 603,603 |
Citation | 148 S.E.2d 229,267 N.C. 392 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | Bernadine WILES d/b/a Centerview Taxi v. Ralph P. MULLINAX, Jr. and Mullinax Insurance Agency, Inc. |
Williams, Willeford & Boger, Concord, for plaintiff appellant.
Hartsell, Hartsell & Mills, by Harold H. Smith, Concord, for defendant appellees.
This Court has several times stated the rule applicable to plaintiff's allegations and evidence:
'It is very generally held that, where an insurance agent or broker undertakes to procure a policy of insurance for another affording protection against a designated risk, the law imposes upon him the duty in the exercise of reasonable care to perform the duty he has assumed, and within the amount of the proposed policy he may be held liable for the loss properly attributable to his negligent default.' Elam v. Smithdeal Realty Co., 182 N.C. 599, 602, 109 S.E. 632, 633, 18 A.L.R. 1210.
Accord, Interstate Textile Equipment Co. v. Swimmer, 259 N.C. 69, 130 S.E.2d 6; Bank of French Broad Inc. v. Bryan, 240 N.C. 610, 83 S.E.2d 485; Meiselman v. Wicker, 224 N.C. 417, 30 S.E.2d 317; Boney, Insurance Comr. v. Central Mut. Insurance Co., 213 N.C. 563, 197 S.E. 122. See also 4 Couch, Insurance § 26:460 (2d Ed. 1960); 44 C.J.S. Insurance § 172 (1945); 29 Am.Jur., Insurance § 163 (1960).
If a broker or agent is unable to procure the insurance he has undertaken to provide, he impliedly undertakes--and it is his duty--to give timely notice to his customer, the proposed insured, who may then take the necessary steps to secure the insurance elsewhere or otherwise protect himself. Annot., Insurance Broker or Agent--Liability, 29 A.L.R.2d 171, 184 (1953); 29 Am.Jur., Insurance § 164 (1960). When, under these circumstances, the broker fails to give such notice, he renders himself liable for the resulting damage which his client suffered from lack of insurance. 44 C.J.S. Insurance § 172 (1945).
Where an insurance broker becomes liable to his customer for failure to provide him with the promised insurance, the latter at his election, may sue for breach of contract or for negligent default in the performance of a duty imposed by contract. Interstate Textile Equipment Co. v. Swimmer, supra; Bank of French Broad Inc. v. Bryan, supra; Elam v. Smithdeal Realty Co., supra; 44 C.J.S. Insurance § 172(b) (1945).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we are required to do, it appears: (1) In 1951, defendants had agreed to provide plaintiff with continuous workmen's compensation coverage, and, from November 1951 through November 1958, without any further request from her, they had done so; (2) Plaintiff had paid the premium or arranged for its payment only when she was billed; (3) On November 18, 1958, after unsuccessful efforts to place her insurance with two companies, defendants permitted her coverage to expire without notice to her; and (4) As a result, she became personally liable, 21 days later, to pay the widow of a deceased employee...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sanchez v. Martinez
...v. Securities Acceptance Corp., 74 N.M. 755, 398 P.2d 980 (1965); White v. Calley, 67 N.M. 343, 355 P.2d 280 (1960); Wiles v. Mullinax, 267 N.C. 392, 148 S.E.2d 229 (1966). An agent who agrees to procure or renew an expired policy of insurance has a duty to either obtain the insurance, rene......
-
Priddy v. Mayer Aviation, Inc., 75--347
...obtain or deliver an insurance policy either ex delicto or ex contractu. Ursini v. Goldman, 118 Conn. 554, 173 A. 789 (1934); Wiles v. Mullinax, Jr., 267 N.C. 392, 148 S.W.2d 229 (1966); Hall v. Charlton, 447 S.W.2d 5 (Mo.Ct.App.1969); Pittman v. Great American Life Ins. Co., 512 S.W.2d 857......
-
Fli-Back Co., Inc. v. Philadelphia Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co.
...summarized in Wiles v. Mullinax, 270 N.C. 661, 155 S.E.2d 246 (1967), describing the holding on the first appeal in that case, 267 N.C. 392, 148 S.E.2d 229 (1966): We . . . held that, where an insurance agent or broker undertakes to procure a policy of insurance for another, it is his duty ......
-
Wiles v. Mullinax, 36
...Concord, and Boyd C. Campbell, Jr., for defendant appellees. LAKE, Justice. Upon the first appeal in this matter, reported in 267 N.C. 392, 148 S.E.2d 229, we held that, when an insurance agent or broker undertakes to procure a policy of insurance for another and is unable to do so, it is h......