Will Sanders v. State
| Decision Date | 04 November 1895 |
| Citation | Will Sanders v. State, 18 So. 541, 73 Miss. 444 (Miss. 1895) |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | WILL SANDERS v. STATE |
October 1895
FROM the circuit court of LaFayette county, HON. EUGENE JOHNSON Judge.
On the trial of the appellant, on an indictment for burglary, the assistant counsel for the prosecution, in his argument to the jury, used this language: "There was enough in this evidence to make it incumbent on the defendant to deny it and he has not done so." Upon defendant's objection the trial court properly stopped counsel and told him that he could not allude to or comment upon the fact that the defendant had not testified in his own behalf, and told the jury that they must disregard what counsel had said. And counsel thereupon said to the jury: "Well, then, consider that not said."
Defendant was convicted. Motion for new trial overruled; hence this appeal.
Reversed.
Kimmons & Kimmons and Stone & Lowry, for appellant.
The action of the assistant prosecuting attorney in commenting on the failure of the accused to testify vitiates the verdict. Yarborough v. State, 70 Miss. 593.
Frank Johnston, attorney-general, for the state.
In the case of Yarborough v. State, 70 Miss. 593, the following expression was employed: "This failure of counsel for the state to heed the presiding judge's admonition . . . must reverse the case," etc. From the language so used it impliedly follows that where the admonition of the judge is heeded, and counsel himself withdraws the objectionable remark, and the jury are told to disregard it, there is no reversible error.
The judgment in this case must be reversed, and a new trial awarded, because counsel for the state, in his argument before the jury, commented upon the failure of appellant to testify. The statute expressly declares that "the failure of the accused, in any case, to testify shall not operate to his prejudice or be commented on by counsel." It is...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Winchester v. State
... ... J ... D. FATHEREE, Judge ... APPEAL ... from circuit court of Lauderdale county, HON. J. D. FATHEREE, ... Will O ... Winchester was convicted of murder, and he appeals. Reversed, ... and cause remanded for a new trial ... Reversed and ... State, 92 Miss. 180, 45 So. 149; Smith v ... State, 87 Miss. 627, 40 So. 229; Reddick v ... State, 72 Miss. 1008, 16 So. 490; Sanders v ... State, 73 Miss. 444, 18 So. 541; Yarbrough v ... State, 70 Miss. 593, 12 So. 551; Sanders v ... State, 73 Miss. 444, 18 So. 541; Hoff v ... ...
-
Livingston v. State
...of the jury to disregard prosecutor's comments on the defendant's failure to testify did not cure the error). See also Sanders v. State, 73 Miss. 444, 18 So. 541 (1895); Reddick v. State, 72 Miss. 1008, 16 So. 490 (1895). Our cases on point clearly indicate that once such improper comments ......
-
Wright v. State
...46 So. 537 (1908); Smith v. State, 87 Miss. 627, 40 So. 229 (1906); Hoff v. State, 83 Miss. 488, 35 So. 950 (1904); Sanders v. State, 73 Miss. 444, 18 So. 541 (1895); Reddick v. State, 72 Miss. 1008, 16 So. 490 (1895); Yarbrough v. State, 70 Miss. 593, 12 So. 551 (1893). As such, I find tha......
-
Shook v. State
... ... As I stated earlier in the week, I'm satisfied that if he will cooperate with his family and will cooperate with his oral interpreter and will cooperate with his attorney that the communication channels are open ... See also Sanders v. State, 73 ... Page 853 ... Miss. 444, 18 So. 541 (1895); Reddick v. State, 72 Miss. 1008, 16 So. 490 (1895). Our cases on point clearly ... ...