William Mack Loder v. the State.
| Decision Date | 06 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 31829,31829 |
| Citation | William Mack Loder v. the State., 232 S.E.2d 71, 238 Ga. 200 (Ga. 1977) |
| Parties | William Mack LODER v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Robert M. Coker, Atlanta, for appellant.
Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Atlanta, for appellee.
The court grants the applicant's petition for a writ of certiorari in Loder v. State, 140 Ga.App. 166, 230 S.E.2d 124(1976), vacates the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remands to that court for reconsideration in view of Thornton v. State, 238 Ga. 160, 231 S.E.2d 729(1977).SeeRule 37(c).
Judgment vacated with direction.
All the Justices concur, except GUNTER and INGRAM, JJ., who would grant certiorari for full consideration by this court, and JORDAN, J., who would deny certiorari.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
People v. Cattaneo
...(State v. Hecht (1984) 116 Wis.2d 605, 342 N.W.2d 721, 731; Loder v. State (1976) 140 Ga.App. 166, 230 S.E.2d 124, 127, vacated by 238 Ga. 200, 232 S.E.2d 71, reaffirmed in 141 Ga.App. 665, 234 S.E.2d 132; State v. Mansir (Me.1982) 440 A.2d 6, 7.) Defendant, citing People v. Beeman (1984) 3......
-
Anderson v. State
...376, 377(2), 224 S.E.2d 58 (1976); Loder v. State, 140 Ga.App. 166, 169(3), 230 S.E.2d 124 (1976) (vacated on other grounds, 238 Ga. 200, 232 S.E.2d 71; affirmed on remand, 141 Ga.App. 665, 234 S.E.2d 132); Gamble v. State, 141 Ga.App. 304(2), 233 S.E.2d 264 (1977); Hall v. State, 143 Ga.Ap......
-
Crass v. State
...129 Ga.App. 107, 198 S.E.2d 718; Loder v. State, 140 Ga.App. 166, 168(2), 230 S.E.2d 124, judgment vacated on other grounds, s. c., 238 Ga. 200, 232 S.E.2d 71; Jackson v. State, 143 Ga.App. 406(1), 238 S.E.2d 752. There is no merit in this 12. For the same reason as that stated in Division ......
-
State v. Martin
... ... 21, 1980 ... Certiorari Denied Jan. 20, 1981 ... [156 Ga.App. 557] William Bryan Huff, Dist. Atty., Gerald W. Brown, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant ... 215(2), 202 S.E.2d 686; Kitchens v. State, 134 Ga.App. 81(3), 213 S.E.2d 180; see also Loder v. State, 140 Ga.App. 166, 168(1), 230 S.E.2d 124, vacated 238 Ga. 200, 232 S.E.2d 713 affd. 141 ... ...
Get Started for Free