Williams Bros. Corporation v. Hicks
| Decision Date | 01 February 1944 |
| Citation | 16 So.2d 432,154 Fla. 44 |
| Parties | WILLIAMS BROTHERS CORPORATION and Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Company, Ltd., Appellants, v. Rufus McAmy HICKS and Empire A. Hicks, his Wife, and Florida Industrial Commission, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1944.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; George E. Holt and Paul D. Barns, Judges.
McKay, Dixon & DeJarnette and A. Lee Bradford, all of Miami, for appellants.
Cody Fowler, of Miami, for appellees.
Judgment affirmed.
Additional attorney's fee in the sum of $150 for services in Circuit and Supreme Court to be recovered by appellees from appellants is awarded.
So ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sherman v. Florida Tar & Creosote Corp.
...v. Sumpter County et al., 152 Fla. 864, 13 So.2d 219; Stone and Stone et al. v. Scott, et al, 151 Fla. 21, 9 So.2d 168; Williams Bros. v. Hicks, 154 Fla. 44, 16 So.2d 432. What has been with reference to the father's dependence on the deceased son applies as well to the claim of the mother ......
-
McCall v. Motor Fuel Carriers
... ... Putnam Lumber Co., 152 Fla. 520, ... 12 So.2d 370; Williams Brothers Corporation et al v ... Rufus McAmy Hicks et al., Fla., 16 ... ...
-
Paul Spellman, Inc. v. Spellman
...great length of time. Respondents quote at length from the findings of the Deputy Commissioner in Williams Brothers Corp. v. Hicks, 1944, 154 Fla. 44, 16 So.2d 432 (affirmed per curiam), wherein a mother, although mainly supported by her husband, was held to be a partial dependent of her de......
- Miller v. Tilden