Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc., BOYLAN-PEARC
Decision Date | 02 April 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 458A84,INC,BOYLAN-PEARC,458A84 |
Citation | 327 S.E.2d 870,313 N.C. 321 |
Parties | Wendy Eve WILLIAMS v. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Maupin, Taylor & Ellis, P.A. by Thomas W.H. Alexander and James A. Roberts III, for defendant-appellant.
Brenton D. Adams, for plaintiff-appellee.
MITCHELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial15 cases
-
Moore v. City of Creedmoor
...in original) (quoting Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc., 69 N.C.App. 315, 319, 317 S.E.2d 17, 20 (1984), aff'd per curiam, 313 N.C. 321, 327 S.E.2d 870 (1985)). Actual malice, which "is more difficult to substantiate ... is only required if plaintiff is seeking punitive damages." Id., 105 N.C......
-
Turner v. Thomas
...prosecution begins. Williams v. Boylan–Pearce, Inc. , 69 N.C.App. 315, 318–19, 317 S.E.2d 17, 19 (1984), aff'd per curiam , 313 N.C. 321, 327 S.E.2d 870 (1985) ; see also Cook , 267 N.C. at 170, 147 S.E.2d at 914 ("In order to give a cause of action for malicious prosecution, such prosecuti......
-
Bernard Scarbor. v. Dillard's Inc
...417 S.E.2d 447 (1992), and Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc., 69 N.C.App. 315, 319, 317 S.E.2d 17, 20 (1984), aff'd per curiam, 313 N.C. 321, 327 S.E.2d 870 (1985). Plaintiff's reliance on these cases is misplaced as each of them is distinguishable on its facts from the present case. In Jones......
-
Marlowe v. Piner
...question of law and fact. Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc., 69 N.C.App. 315, 319, 317 S.E.2d 17, 20 (1984), aff'd per curiam, 313 N.C. 321, 327 S.E.2d 870 (1985). If the facts are admitted or established, it is a question of law for the court. Id. However, if the facts are in dispute, the qu......
Request a trial to view additional results