Williams v. Davis
Decision Date | 20 May 1930 |
Citation | 27 S.W.2d 1064,224 Mo.App. 481 |
Parties | NORA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. WYLEY L. DAVIS, ADMINISTRATOR DE BONIS NON OF W. J. WILLIAMS, DECEASED, RESPONDENT. [*] |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pemiscot County.--Hon. John E Duncan, Judge.
REVERSED AND REMANDED (with directions).
Judgment reversed and remanded.
Von Mayes for appellant.
(1) The general rule is that the proceeds of a policy of insurance takes the place of property, in case of a loss after the death of the insured, and should be distributed as the insured property would have been distributed had no loss occurred. 16 A. L. 313; 4 (Supplement) R. C. L., sec. 535, p 966; 26 C. J., sec. 593, p. 444; Sauner v. Ins. Co., 41 Mo.App. 480; Millard v. Beaumont, 194 Mo.App. 69; Culbertson v. Cox, 29 Minn. 309. (2) The property allowed the widow by section 105, Revised Statutes 1919, is exempt from claims of her husband's creditors and upon the death of her husband she has a vested interest therein which is assignable or goes to her heirs. Griswold v. Mattix, 21 Mo.App. 282; Hastings v. Myers, 21 Mo. 519; Thompson v. Johnson, 160 S.W. 812. (3) The title of an administrator as to the proceeds of fire insurance, when loss occurs after the death of the insured is that of trustee. Sauner v. Ins. Co., 41 Mo.App. 480. In fact an administrator holds any personal property of the estate as trustee for the heirs and creditors. State v. Myers, 44 Mo. 361; Kelley's Probate Guide, sec. 172 p. 170.
McKay & Peal for respondent.
(1) The contract of insurance is one of indemnity only, and from its character as a contract of indemnity the result follows that it is a personal contract with the insured which does not run with the insured property unless expressly so stipulated. 26 C. J., pp. 17 and 18, sec. 1; Millard v. Beaumont, 194 Mo.App. 69; Key. v. Continental Ins. Co., 101 Mo.App. 344; Doggett v. Blanke, 70 Mo.App. 499; Jecko v. Ins. Co., 7 Mo.App. 308. (2) A fire insurance policy is not a contract to insure property against fire, but is one to insure the owner of property against loss by fire. Draper v. Ins. Co. 28 Del. 143; Amusement Syndicate Co. v. Ins. Co., 85 Kan. 616.
This cause was instituted in the Probate Court of Pemiscot county by Nora Williams filing the following petition on the 11th day of February, 1929, caption omitted:
Thereafter, the probate court of that county, on February 15, 1929, after hearing the evidence, ordered the administrator to pay the petitioner $ 500 of the insurance money. The administrator appealed to the circuit court of that county, where on the 1st day of June, 1929, the cause was submitted to that court on an agreed statement of facts, and a judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant. Proper steps were taken by the plaintiff for an appeal to this court.
The agreed statement of facts upon which the judgment was rendered, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial