Williams v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 94-368
| Decision Date | 13 January 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-368,94-368 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D176 Gary WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jane E. Carey, Morall & Carey, Orlando, for appellant.
Patricia A. Savitz, Orlando, for appellee.
Gary Williams appeals a final order terminating his parental rights to his three children. We affirm.
HRS initially sought shelter and dependency for Williams' children in 1990, due principally to drug use by both parents and domestic violence. The children were found to be dependent and removed to foster care. In January 1994, the hearing on the petition to terminate the parental rights of the children's mother and of appellant was held. At issue is what occurred during the three and a half years of dependency, specifically whether the lower court erred in concluding that Williams had failed substantially to comply with his performance agreement during that period.
What makes this case difficult is that, in several respects, Gary Williams did endeavor to meet his obligations under the performance agreement. He had stable employment as a mason, earning a good income. 1 He attended parenting classes, frequently visited the children and cooperated with HRS counselors. He attended outpatient drug treatment.
What he did not do was remain drug free, a key component of the performance agreement. On five occasions in this three year period, random drug tests administered to Williams were positive. The most recent was October 25, 1993, less than two months before the termination hearing. Williams also seemed incapable of terminating, or at least substantially improving, his violent, co-dependent relationship with the children's mother, who was so severely addicted to drugs that she never attempted to comply with her performance agreement and did not contest the termination of her parental rights. As late as the month before the final hearing, they were living together. Williams' contention that he substantially complied with his performance agreement is therefore rejected. Failure to comply with the performance agreement is evidence of abuse, abandonment or neglect. See Sec. 39.464(5), Fla.Stat. (1993). A parent's drug addiction is evidence of prospective neglect. Brown v. Dep't of HRS, 582 So.2d 113, 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
In terminating Williams' parental rights, based on clear and convincing evidence of prospective neglect, the lower court made the following findings:
8. That the mother started ingesting cocaine at the age of 21 in approximately 1984. Gary Williams and the mother have maintained a relationship since approximately 1987. Gary Williams started ingesting cocaine approximately five or six years ago. E.W. was born on 8/31/90 with cocaine in her system as a result of the mother's ingestion of cocaine while pregnant. By the time of the E.W.'s birth, both the mother and Gary Williams were longtime users of cocaine. As a result of the cocaine usage in the family, E.W., E.W., and C.W. were removed from the care of the mother and Gary Williams, they were adjudicated dependent and placed in foster care.
9. In October 1990, the mother and Gary Williams entered into Performance Agreements which required them, together with other requirements, to remain drug-free daily and to complete a drug treatment regimen that drug usage would no longer be part of their life.
10. Despite attendance at drug treatment, both parents continued to use cocaine during 1991. After a period of attendance in drug treatment, the mother relapsed and her cocaine usage encompassed a period from May 1991 through October 1991. Gary Williams also continued to ingest cocaine and he produced positive urinalyses for cocaine in September and October 1991.
11. S.J. WILLIAMS, a female child, was born on the 9th day of January 1992 having been exposed to the cocaine use of her mother; that child was adjudicated dependent and placed in the care of the Department.
12. From September 1990 through the date of trial, the relationship between the mother...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
TP v. Department of Children and Families
...good intentions for the future do not overcome her past neglect of her children ..."); see also Williams v. Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 648 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) ("a parent's drug addiction is evidence of prospective neglect"); In the Interest of J.L.P., 416 So.2d 1......
-
Gaines v. Department of Children & Families
...Richmond v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 658 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Williams v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 648 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Palmer v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 547 So.2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismiss......
-
Hroncich v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 95-761
...Richmond v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 658 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Williams v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 648 So.2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (drug addiction evidence of prospective neglect); Palmer v. Department of Health and Rehabilitativ......
-
CC v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES, 1D01-2996.
...and that her continuing "failure to seek drug treatment is evidence of prospective neglect"); Williams v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 648 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (noting that "evidence, including Williams' inability to remain drug free or to demonstrate an ability to......
-
Barriers, Hurdles, and Discrimination: The Current Status of LGBT Intercountry Adoption and Why Changes Must Be Made to Effectuate the Best Interests of the Child
...first came into being after World War II 589, 592 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006) (quoting Williams v. Dep‘t of Health and Rehab. Servs., 648 So. 2d 841, 843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995)) (―Without a doubt, ‗it is far better for th[is] child [] to be placed for adoption with a loving and stable family t......