Williams v. Jenkins
| Decision Date | 14 October 1930 |
| Docket Number | 29219 |
| Citation | 32 S.W.2d 580,326 Mo. 722 |
| Parties | WILLIAMS v. JENKINS et al |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Motion for Rehearing Overruled November 18, 1930.
Paul H. Ditzen and Justus N. Baird, both of Kansas City, Kan., for appellants.
A. N. Gossett, of Kansas City, and Franken & Timmons, of Carrollton, for respondents.
Action in two counts to quiet title and partition 185 acres of land in Carroll county. The court found the allegations of the petition to be true. Judgment was entered accordingly, and defendants Camilla Lauffer, Mary Lauffer, and Hilda Pabel appealed. Pending appeal, Camilla Lauffer died, leaving the other appealing defendants as her only heirs at law. By agreement, the cause was here revived as to Camilla Lauffer in the names of Mary Lauffer and Hilda Pabel.
An examination of the motion for a new trial discloses no assignment of error. A copy of the motion follows:
'Come now the defendants Camilla Lauffer, Mary Lauffer, and Hilda Pabel, by their attorneys John T. Morris, Paul H. Ditzen and Justus N. Baird and move the court for an order setting aside the judgment rendered in this cause and granting these defendants a new trial for the reason that the court erred in rendering judgment against these defendants.'
The motion is only a claim that judgment should have been for defendants. It directs attention to no claim of error. An assignment in such general terms presents no question for review. Rhorer v. Brockhage, 15 Mo.App. 16, loc. cit. 25; Wampler v. Ry. Co., 269 Mo. 464, 190 S.W. 908, loc. cit. 911, 912; Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City, 265 Mo. 252, loc. cit. 265, 177 S.W. 856.
It follows the judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ruehling v. Pickwick-Greyhound Lines
... ... Ry. Co., 200 Mo. 347; ... Michely v. Miss. Valley Struc. Steel Co., 299 S.W ... 830; So. Ry. Co. v. Harpin, 68 S.E. 1103; ... Williams v. Hines, 86 So. 695; Loveman v ... Bayless, 160 S.W. 841; Pangborn v. Buick Motor ... Co., 105 N.E. 423; Doremus v. Root, 63 P. 572; ... Indiana ... 212; Whitehead v ... Liberty Natl. Bank, 56 S.W.2d 833; Belcher v ... Haddix, 44 S.W.2d 177; Williams v. Jenkins, 32 ... S.W.2d 580, 326 Mo. 722; Greer v. Carpenter, 19 ... S.W.2d 1046. (2) An assignment of error that verdict is ... against the law is ... ...
-
Oetting v. Green
... ... assignments of error for review. Matthews v. Karnes, ... 9 S.W.2d 628; Castorina v. Herrmann, 340 Mo. 1026, ... 104 S.W.2d 297; Williams v. Jenkins, 326 Mo. 722, 32 ... S.W.2d 580; Colin v. Moldenhauer, 338 Mo. 827, 92 ... S.W.2d 601. (8) The method adopted by respondent is proper ... ...
-
Citizens Bank of Pleasant Hill v. Robinson
... ... renewal notes, cannot now raise the question for the first ... time in the appellate court. Williams v. Jenkins, 32 ... S.W.2d 580, 326 Mo. 722; Belcher v. Haddix, 44 ... S.W.2d 177; Waters v. Gallemore, 41 S.W.2d 870; ... Berry v. Rood, ... ...
-
City of St. Louis v. Senter Com'n Co.
... ... Poage, 231 Mo. 82, l. c. 91, 132 S.W ... 241; Wiltshire v. Triplett, 71 Mo.App. 332, l. c ... 337; Sweet v. Maupin, 65 Mo. 65; Williams v ... Jenkins, 326 Mo. 722, 32 S.W.2d 580.] But was it ... necessary that the complaint now urged -- that the judgment ... did not follow the ... ...