Williams v. Meyer, 83-1806

Decision Date08 August 1985
Docket NumberNo. 83-1806,83-1806
Citation10 Fla. L. Weekly 1887,474 So.2d 1214
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 1887 Linda WILLIAMS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Andreas Harris, Appellant, v. Alois A. MEYER, State Farm Insurance Company, Eartha Brown Ferguson, and Teachers Insurance Company, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Leon M. Boyajan II of Law Offices of J. Russell Hornsby, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Frederick J. Daniels of Driscoll, Langston, Kane & Hess, P.A., Orlando, for appellees Alois A. Meyer and State Farm Ins. Co.

Corey R. Stutin of Rice, Steinberg & Stutin, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Eartha Brown Ferguson.

UPCHURCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment after jury verdict denying plaintiff recovery for the wrongful death of Andreas Harris, a child six years of age.

Andreas Harris lived with appellee, Eartha Ferguson, his paternal grandmother. On January 30, 1982, Mrs. Ferguson and Andreas were running errands. Mrs. Ferguson stopped her car at a fruit stand at the intersection of Clarcoma Road and Highway 435 in Orange County to make some purchases. She left Andreas in the car. Upon returning to her car, she closed her door and pulled onto Highway 435. Shortly after entering the highway, she realized the passenger door was open and Andreas was not in the automobile. She stopped her car and ran back down the road where she found that Andreas had been run over and killed by a car which was following her. That car was driven by Alois A. Meyer.

The personal representative of Harris' estate sued Meyer and his insurer and Mrs. Ferguson and her insurer. The trial court directed a verdict for Meyer and his insurer and a jury verdict was ultimately entered in favor of Ferguson and her insurer finding no negligence on Mrs. Ferguson's part.

As to entry of the directed verdict in favor of Meyer, we find no error. Where the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom fail to prove the plaintiff's case, a directed verdict is appropriate. Hartnett v. Fowler, 94 So.2d 724 (Fla.1957); Howarth v. Moreau, 430 So.2d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); National Car Rental v. Bruce A. Ryals Enter., 380 So.2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Here, there was no evidence that Meyer was aware a child was in the car or children were in the area. An expert witness testified that the child could have been seen by Meyer only if the child was in a sitting position or higher than six inches above the road. There was no evidence that...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Maler By and Through Maler v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc., 89-756
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 26 Diciembre 1989
    ...the jury. See Smith v. Brown, 525 So.2d 868, 869 (Fla.1988); Horowitz v. Schwartz, 74 So.2d 801, 804 (Fla.1954); Williams v. Meyer, 474 So.2d 1214, 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Lazenby v. Beisel, 425 So.2d 84, 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), approved, 444 So.2d 953 Finally, we have carefully examined t......
  • Tinwood N.V. v. Sun Banks, Inc., 89-2281
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 Noviembre 1990
    ...94 So.2d 724 (Fla.1957). See generally, Holmes v. Don Mealey Chevrolet, Inc., 468 So.2d 552 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Williams v. Meyer, 474 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Jennings v. Ray, 484 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Thus the broad question on this appeal is whether, viewing the evidenc......
  • Riley v. Willis
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 22 Agosto 1991
    ... ... Summary judgment for the driver was affirmed. In Williams v. Meyer, 474 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), a directed verdict was upheld for a driver who struck ... ...
  • Siegel v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 86-2338
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 27 Octubre 1987
    ...for plaintiff and directing verdict for defendant where plaintiff failed to establish essential elements of claim); Williams v. Meyer, 474 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (directed verdict proper where evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom failed to prove plaintiff's ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT