Williams v. State

Citation40 S.W. 801
PartiesWILLIAMS v. STATE.
Decision Date05 May 1897
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

DAVIDSON, J.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to rob, and given five years in the penitentiary, and prosecutes this appeal.

This case came before us at the last Tyler term, 1896, and was affirmed. 38 S. W. 202. It is now before us on motion for rehearing. The only question which requires to be considered is the charge of the court, which is as follows: "Where there are conflicts in the testimony of the witnesses, it is your duty to reconcile them, if you can; but, if you cannot, you must decide which of the testimony is entitled to the greater credibility and weight, and, in so determining, you may consider the intelligence, interest, apparent bias, or prejudice, if any, of witnesses, as well as their manner of testifying." The question is similar to the one decided in Harrell v. State (just decided) 40 S. W. 799, and, for the reasons there assigned, the motion for a rehearing is granted, and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT