Williams v. State
Decision Date | 22 May 2015 |
Docket Number | No. 2D12–6172.,2D12–6172. |
Citation | 164 So.3d 739 |
Parties | Jonathan WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Tanya M. Dugree of the Law Office of Tanya M. Dugree, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Brandon R. Christian, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Jonathan Williams appeals his judgments and sentences for sexual battery with a deadly weapon, as charged, and robbery with a weapon, a lesser included offense of robbery with a firearm. The trial court sentenced Mr. Williams to life in prison on the sexual battery charge, followed by thirty years in prison for the robbery. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)(A). The trial court imposed the consecutive sentences on the impermissible basis that Mr. Williams failed to show remorse and advanced an incredible defense. We affirm the judgments without further discussion but reverse for resentencing before a new judge.1
Mr. Williams' criminal punishment code scoresheet called for a minimum allowable prison sentence of 174.9 months (14.575 years) up to a maximum prison sentence of life. In rejecting Mr. Williams' request for the minimum allowable prison sentence, the trial court expressly noted the overwhelming evidence against Mr. Williams and his implausible defense. The trial court stated,
When a sentencing court expressly considers the improper factors of a defendant's assertions of innocence and refusal to admit guilt, the truthfulness of his testimony, or the failure to show remorse, fundamental error and a denial of due process occur. See Gage v. State, 147 So.3d 1020, 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ( ); Johnson v. State, 120 So.3d 629, 631–32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ( ); Diaz v. State, 106 So.3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) ( ); Smith v. State, 62 So.3d 698, 699–700 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) ( ); Brown v. State, 27 So.3d 181, 182–83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ( ); Hannum v. State, 13 So.3d 132, 135–36 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Melendez v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
...fundamental error occurs.'” Strong v. State, 263 So.3d 199, 200 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (bolding added). See also Williams v. State, 164 So.3d 739, 740 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (“When a sentencing court expressly considers the improper factors of a defendant's assertions of innocence and refusal to a......
-
Rodriguez-Aguilar v. State
...guilt, unwillingness to take responsibility for his actions, or the untruthfulness of his testimony. See, e.g., Williams v. State, 164 So.3d 739, 740–41 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Bracero v. State, 10 So.3d 664, 665–66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hannum v. State, 13 So.3d 132, 135–36 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).......
-
Fernandez v. State
...fundamental error in the sentencing process. Yisrael v. State , 65 So.3d 1177, 1177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) ; see also Williams v. State , 164 So.3d 739, 740 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (finding "fundamental error and a denial of due process" in the consideration of certain sentencing factors). The ques......
- Benton v. State, 5D15–1203.