Williams v. State, 88-00715

Decision Date11 August 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-00715,88-00715
Citation14 Fla. L. Weekly 1906,547 So.2d 710
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 1906 Albert WILLIAMS, a/k/a Malik Sharife, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Albert Williams a/k/a Malik Sharife, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

Albert Williams appeals a judgment adjudicating him guilty of sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine and the resulting sentences. We affirm the conviction for the sale but vacate the conviction for possession.

Williams argues that his conviction for sale of cocaine must be vacated because the information listed that offense as a third-degree felony instead of a second-degree felony. Williams failed to raise this error until this appeal. Any defect in an information is waived if an objection is not made timely as long as the information does not wholly fail to state a crime. Tracey v. State, 130 So.2d 605 (Fla.1961); Shanklin v. State, 369 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). This defect, therefore, was waived. Although the heading of the information does state that the crime is a third-degree felony, the body of the information makes clear that Williams was charged with possession of cocaine and further cites to section 893.03(2)(a)4, which lists cocaine as a schedule two controlled substance. This information in the body of the charging instrument sufficiently advised Williams that he was charged with a second-degree felony. Thus, there was no fundamental error because this error in the information did not violate Williams's due process rights or double jeopardy protections. Accordingly, Williams's conviction for sale of cocaine will not be vacated.

Next Williams challenges his convictions for both sale and possession of cocaine on double jeopardy grounds. The testimony was that the confidential informant purchased two rocks of cocaine from Williams and that Williams had these rocks in his robe pocket. There was no testimony that Williams retained or possessed any other cocaine. Because Williams's conduct dealt with a single act, his convictions for sale of cocaine and possession of the same cocaine violated his double jeopardy protection. See Gordon v. State, 528 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), approved, State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla.1989). Although section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (Supp.1988) 1 would change this result, we note that this statute may be applied only to offenses committed after June 30, 1988, see Smith, 547 So.2d at 615-617, and that Williams committed these crimes on May 14, 1987. Accordingly, Williams's conviction for possession of cocaine, the lesser crime, must be set aside. See State v. Barton, 523 So.2d 152 (Fla.1988). 2

We affirm the conviction for sale of cocaine and vacate the conviction for possession of cocaine. We remand to the trial court to enter the appropriate amended judgment and recalculate the sentence without the possession offense being scored.

Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded with directions.

FRANK, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

1 This statute provides in pertinent part:

(4)(a) Whoever, in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Connolly v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Mayo 2014
    ...is waived if no objection is timely made so long as the information does not wholly fail to state a crime. SeeWilliams v. State, 547 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); State v. Duarte, 681 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Catanese v. State, 251 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Where a defendant w......
  • Singleton v. State, 87-01300
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 Mayo 1990
    ...2 it was a violation of double jeopardy for Singleton to be convicted of sale and possession of the same cocaine. See Williams v. State, 547 So.2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Dukes v. State, 528 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, Singleton's conviction for possession of cocaine, the les......
  • State v. Burnette, 1D03-3178.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 30 Agosto 2004
    ...is waived if no objection is timely made so long as the information does not wholly fail to state a crime. See Williams v. State, 547 So.2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); State v. Duarte, 681 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Catanese v. State, 251 So.2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Where a defendant wai......
  • State v. Duarte, 95-02424
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 Octubre 1996
    ...is waived if an objection is not made timely as long as the information does not wholly fail to state a crime." Williams v. State, 547 So.2d 710, 711 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The information here did not wholly fail to state a crime. We conclude that the appellee has waived any objection to the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT