Williams v. State, 91-01146

Decision Date08 January 1992
Docket NumberNo. 91-01146,91-01146
Citation591 So.2d 329
PartiesTracy T. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 591 So.2d 329, 17 Fla. L. Week. D226
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; William J. Nelson, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Andrea Norgard, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

Tracy T. Williams appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary and grand theft. We affirm the convictions but remand to conform the written order to the oral pronouncements made at sentencing.

The trial court's oral pronouncements at sentencing imposed a four-year prison term for burglary followed by concurrent terms of four years' probation on each of two counts of grand theft. Nevertheless, the written sentence reflects concurrent terms of four years' prison on all three counts followed by four years' probation on count II, grand theft. We remand to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncements and to determine credit for time served on the grand theft sentences. See Oliver v. State, 556 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed and remanded.

FRANK, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Skubal v. Cooley, 93-3119
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 8, 1995
  • Chase v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1995
    ...at sentencing, we strike the 5-year term of probation. Lundon v. State, 652 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 329 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm Mr. Chase's judgments and sentences in all other Affirmed as modified. ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and LAZZARA, JJ......
  • Murph v. State, 94-04557
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 20, 1995
    ...This court must remand the case for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. See Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 329 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We, therefore, remand with directions to the trial court to enter a written sentence which complies with its oral FRANK, A.......
  • Jackson v. State, 92-04620
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 3, 1994
    ...on remand, the trial court must correct the sentence in Count II to conform to the oral pronouncement. See Williams v. State, 591 So.2d 329 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm the revocations of probation. We reverse the sentences in Counts I and II and remand for correction of the credit DANAHY,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT