Williams v. State

Decision Date05 February 1968
Docket NumberNo. 1329,1329
PartiesHarvey WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Fiorida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Alcee L. Hastings, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Fred T. Gallagher, Asst. Atty. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Harvey Williams, jointly with co-defendants Warren Thornton, George D. Anthony and Nimrod Grace, was charged with attempted robbery on 19 August 1966. They were tried in the Court of Record for Broward County, Florida, found guilty by jury verdict and sentenced to five years at hard labor. The appellant's post-trial motion for a new trial was denied.

The board question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict.

The prosecuting witness, William Riebley, testified that at 11:45 p.m. on the night of 19 August 1966 he was in his office at the Coral Rock Bar in Hallandale, Broward County, Florida, looking out the window and saw a blue and white Oldsmobile pull up by an ice house twenty feet north of the office. The vehicle stayed for about five minutes with its lights off and no one got out. Five to ten minutes later the same vehicle came back, stopped at the same place, and the prosecuting witness saw it was occupied by four Negroes. His suspicion was aroused to the extent that the got hit gun. The car again pulled off after a few minutes and disappeared from Mr. Riebley's view. Mr. Riebley saw no one get out of the car, but shortly after it pulled off, the defendant, Nimrod Grace, entered the premises, approached the prosecuting witness who was near his cash register, raised a double barrelled shotgun and fired at the prosecuting witness who ducked. Grace immediately fled.

Burton Shepard, a Hallandale police officer, testified that at about 11:45 p.m. on 19 August 1966 he was driving a patrol car north on Federal Highway when he observed a blue and white Oldsmobile parked next to the 'ice plant' near the Coral Rock Bar. He observed four Negro males in the vehicle. He continued north for seven blocks and turned to come back. As he reached the front of the Coral Rock Bar he heard shots and saw a Negro male run from the bar and into the east-west alley north of the bar. He turned his vehicle again and proceeded into the alley in time to see what he thought was the blue and white Oldsmobile turn south from the west end of the alley three blocks away. As he was turning his vehicle to enter the alley he radioed a description of the blue and white Oldsmobile and that an armed robbery had occurred. By the time Shepard reached the end of the alley he received a radio message that a vehicle fitting the description was stopped at Beach Boulevard and Federal Highway, two and one-half blocks from the Coral Rock Bar. The officer proceeded to this location and identified the vehicle as the one he had seen at the Coral Rock Bar. When he arrived Officer Stein was getting three Negro males out of the car. They were appellant Harvey Williams, Warren Thornton and George D. Anthony. Nimrod Grace was not in the automobile. The officer said there was no doubt in his mind that the vehicle contained four persons when he saw it by the ice house.

Later that night Mr. Riebley viewed the car that was stopped by Officer Stein and identified it as the one he had twice seen in front of his bar shortly before the attempt. Mr. Riebley made no identification of the people he saw in the automobile, but on 20 August 1966 identified Nimrod Grace as the person who entered the bar and fired at him. He denied ever knowing Grace before the occasion in question.

Richard Stein, a reserve police officer for the City of Hallandale, testified that while he was on duty at 11:45 p.m. on 19 August 1966 he heard Officer Shepard's radio message. Stein was then about six blocks from the Coral Rock Bar and headed there. En route, he spotted the 1956 blue and white Oldsmobile stopping at a light at Beach Boulevard and Federal Highway. He pulled up beside the vehicle and ordered the occupants out. Stein testified that Harvey Williams, Warren Thornton and George D. Anthony were in the car when it was stopped and that appellant Harvey Williams was driving.

John Cataldo, a detective with the Hallandale Police Department, began his investigation shortly after the trio was arrested. He questioned each of the three independently. The appellant and George D. Anthony told Officer Cataldo that there had only been the three of them in the car and that they were coming from Dania to the Palms Club in Hallandale. The third defendant, Warren Thornton, when questioned appeared quite nervous and at first gave a story consistent with that of appellant and Anthony. However, he admitted knowing a 'Nimrod' but did not know his last name. Thornton at first denied that Nimrod was in the car, but then changed his story and admitted Nimrod had been in the car. Officer Cataldo's testimony on this critical point is:

'* * * I asked him right out, 'Do you know a guy named Nimrod?'

'He hemmed and hawed a little--said, 'I do'.

'I said, 'Nimrod what?'

'He said 'That is all I know him by--Nimrod'.

'I said, 'This is the guy that was in the car with you?'

'* * *

'THE WITNESS: At first, he said, 'No--just the three of us'.

'I said, 'Come on. You might as well tell me the truth, because I don't believe you. This Nimrod--he is the other one,' and he said 'Well, I'll tell you'--he said, 'There was four of us in the car. We came down. This Nimrod said he wanted to go in this bar a minute. He said something about the man owing him money, or something, so we pulled over and parked, and we (sic) went in the bar.'

'I asked him did he see a gun, and he said he didn't know what he was going in the bar for. He did go in the bar, and the other three waited in the car, and he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Lord v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 29, 1995
    ...evidence was legally sufficient to support the guilty verdict. Chaudoin v. State, 362 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1978); Williams v. State, 206 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). 492 So.2d at 721. Finding that the state's circumstantial evidence required the jury to impermissibly pyramid inferences......
  • Fox v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 11, 1985
    ...innocence. Gains v. State, 417 So.2d 719, 722-723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), pet. for rev. denied, 426 So.2d 26 (Fla.1983); Williams v. State, 206 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). In Gains, supra, this court reversed the conviction of Joseph Williams for aiding and abetting an armed robbery because......
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 1, 1983
    ...aiding As in any other criminal case, the guilt of an aider or abetter can be established by circumstantial evidence. Williams v. State, 206 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Lockett v. State, 262 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Rosson v. State, 319 So.2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Such evidence, h......
  • Engdall v. State, 75--72
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 26, 1975
    ...accused but inconsistent with every reasonable hypothesis of his innocence. Duran v. State, Fla.App.1974, 301 So.2d 486; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 446; Amato v. State, Fla.App.1974, 296 So.2d 609. In Harrison v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 391, 394--5, the court aptly 'W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT