Williams v. State, WD 78346

Decision Date10 May 2016
Docket NumberWD 78346
Citation497 S.W.3d 778 (Mem)
Parties Jimmie Williams, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Frederick G. Thompson, Kansas City, for Appellant

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent

Before Division Two: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jimmie Williams appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his convictions and sentences for two counts of class B felony child molestation in the first degree. He argues that the motion court clearly erred in finding that the State did not commit a Brady v. Maryland violation regarding audio and forensic DVD recordings and in rejecting his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Williams v. Pash
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • 22 August 2017
    ...the motion court's decision to the Missouri Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the motion court. Williams v. State, 497 S.W.3d 778 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016); Doc. #6-1. In his Petition to this Court, Petitioner articulates the following grounds for relief: (1) The motion court erred......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT