Williams v. Suwanee Longleaf Mfg. Co., 36772

• Decision Date: 09 July 1957
• Docket Number: No. 36772,No. 1,36772,1
• Citation: 96 Ga.App. 260,99 S.E.2d 734
• Parties: T. V. WILLIAMS, Commissioner, etc. v. SUWANEE LONGLEAF MANUFACTURING COMPANY
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Page 734

99 S.E.2d 734

96 Ga.App. 260

T. V. WILLIAMS, Commissioner, etc. v. SUWANEE LONGLEAF MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

No. 36772.

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 1.

July 9, 1957.

Rehearing Denied July 23, 1957.

Syllabus by the Court

Sections 44 and 45 of the Act of 1938 (Ga.L.1937-38 Ex.Sess. pp. 77, 99), as amended by the Act of 1943 (Ga.L.1943, p. 204), deal with appeals from judgments of the State Revenue Commissioner dealing with assessments and not with judgments of such Commissioner wherein a refund of a tax already paid has been denied, inasmuch as the act of 1938, supra, deals elsewhere with such proceedings.

Suwannee Longleaf Manufacturing Company filed a claim with the Commissioner of Revenue of Georgia in which it sought a refund of certain sales taxes which the claimant had paid on a sale which the claimant contended was not subject to any tax imposed by the Sales and Use Tax Act (Ga.L.1951, p. 360 et seq.). From the denial of this claim the claimant appealed to the superior court. The Commissioner filed a general demurrer to the appeal which was overruled, and it is to this judgment that the Commissioner excepts.

Eugene Cook, Atty. Gen., William L. Norton, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Ben F. Johnson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

Smith, Tillman & Brice, B. Lamar Tillman, Valdosta, for defendant in error.

NICHOLS, Judge.

The Commissioner, in his brief, states that there is no contention that the claimant is not entitled to have its claim for refund passed on by the courts, but that it is his position that a direct appeal cannot be taken from his order denying such refund, and that the claimant must file a separate action in the superior court for this purpose. Accordingly, the only question for consideration is whether the claimant can appeal the adverse decision of the Commissioner to the superior court or whether he must file a separate action in order to accomplish this purpose.

Section 19 of the Act of 1951 (Ga.L.1951, pp. 360, 383) provides in part: 'Upon any claim of illegal assessment and collection the taxpayer shall have his remedy under the Code of Georgia, Section 92-8445 et seq., and also shall be allowed to file claims for refund in the manner authorized by the general law.' This section was amended by the Act of 1952 (Ga.L.1952, p. 334), but no change was made in the wording quoted above.

In the Code of 1933, adopted by the General Assembly in an act of 1935 (Ga.L.1935 p. 84), there was no section denominated as § 92-8445, however, § 44 of the Act of 1938 (Ga.L.1937-38, Ex.Sess. pp. 77, 99) was codified in the Annotated Code of Georgia as § 92-8445, and there is no contention that this is not the section to which the Act of 1951, supra, referred. The section, as originally adopted by the General Assembly, had reference to appeals from assessments made by the Commissioner to the Board of Tax Appeals and the following section (Section 45 of the Act of 1938, supra), had reference to appeals from the Board of Tax Appeals to the superior court. Thereafter, the General Assembly, in an act approved February 17, 1943 (Ga.L.1943, p. 204, Code Ann. §§ 92-8426.4, 92-8426.5, 92-8426.6), abolished the Board of Tax Appeals but did not specifically amend sections 44 and 45 of the act of 1938, supra. It did, however, in this act provide: 'Except as otherwise provided by this Act, all matters, cases, claims and controversies, of whatsoever nature arising in the administration of the revenue laws, or in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the State Revenue Commissioner or the Department of Revenue, as conferred by this Act, shall be for determination by the State Revenue Commissioner, subject to review by the courts as provided for by section 45 of chapter IV of this Act. The effect of this section shall be that, except as hereinafter provided, all final rulings, orders and judgments of the State Revenue Commissioner shall be subject to appeal and review under Section 45 of this act in the same manner, under the same procedure, and as fully, as if same had been considered and passed upon by the State Board of Tax Appeals. Any such appeal from a final ruling, order, or judgment of the State Revenue Commissioner shall be entered within the time prescribed by section 45 of the Act: Provided, however, that nothing herein contained, and no provision of this Act, shall be construed to deprive a taxpayer against whom an execution for taxes has been issued under an assessment by the State Revenue Commissioner of the right to resist enforcement of the same by affidavit of illegality.'

Thereafter, in revising their codification of the act of 1938, supra, the publishers of the Georgia Code Annotated removed those parts of the act of 1938, supra, which were specifically repealed and reworded sections 44 and 45 of such Act so as to remove all reference to the appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals before an appeal could be had to the superior court. After a careful consideration of the changes made in sections 44 and 45 (Code Ann. §§ 92-8445, 92-8446), it appears that the publishers of the Georgia Code Annotated have only made such...