Williams v. Williams, No. 30632
Decision Date | 28 January 1976 |
Docket Number | No. 30632 |
Citation | 236 Ga. 133,223 S.E.2d 109 |
Parties | Amos J. WILLIAMS et al. v. Preston WILLIAMS, Executor. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Herschel B. Herrington, Hazelhurst, for appellants.
J. H. Highsmith, Baxley, for appellee.
Appellants, who are beneficiaries under the will of Belle Hayes Williams, deceased, appeal from the dismissal of their complaint for declaratory judgment by the Superior Court of Jeff Davis County. Appellants sought to enjoin the appellee (executor under the will) from selling at public sale the real property of the deceased on the ground that the executor's authority to sell was limited by the right of sale granted to the beneficiaries in the will. The trial court ruled against this construction of the will by appellants and held their complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
The will bequeathed and devised to the husband of the testatrix, if he survived her, all personal property and a life estate in the 40 acres of real property. In the event the husband did not survive the testatrix (which he failed to do), all property except an automobile, was bequeathed and devised to four of the testatrix' daughters, the children of another daughter, Ruby Williams Clarke, and three sons. The daughter, Ruby Williams Clarke, and a son, Amos J. Williams, were no included in this general devise but were each willed the sum of one dollar. This daughter and son have no devised interest in the real property but are also parties with the other beneficiaries under the will. The probate of this will was involved in earlier litigation between the parties and the trial court's judgment in that case was affirmed by this court in Hand v. Williams, 234 Ga. 755, 218 S.E.2d 7 (1975). Subsequent to this court's decision, the executor advertised the real property for sale at public outcry before the courthouse door of Jeff Davis County between the legal hours of sale, as authorized by the will.
The present litigation ensued and the issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly construed the will authorizing the executor to sell the real property free of appellants' claim that such a sale would defeat the beneficiaries' right to sell their interests in the property. We have reviewed the will and conclude, after considering the arguments of all parties, that the trial court's judgment is correct and should be affirmed.
Paragraph 5 of the will provides as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial