Willis v. Strickland, 83-52
| Decision Date | 04 August 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-52,83-52 |
| Parties | Joan Forsyth WILLIS, Shirley L. Hammond and Everard L. Hammond, Appellants, v. Clay L. STRICKLAND, et al., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Anderson E. Hatfield, Gainesville, for appellants.
John F. Bennett of Fishback, Davis, Dominick & Bennett, Orlando, for appellee.
This case involves an interpretation of section 768.125, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides in part:
[A] person who willfully and unlawfully sells or furnishes alcoholic beverages to a person who is not of lawful drinking age ... may become liable for injury or damage caused by or resulting from the intoxication of such minor or person.
In their second amended complaint seeking compensatory and punitive damages appellants allege they were injured as a result of an automobile accident caused by the intoxication of one Clay L. Strickland, a person not of lawful drinking age, to whom employees of ABC Liquors, Inc. (ABC) willfully and unlawfully sold alcoholic beverages. This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of ABC.
On the motion for summary judgment the trial court considered various evidentiary matters (affidavits and depositions). While this evidence is not in conflict, the parties differ in their interpretation of the word "willfully" in the above statute.
The evidentiary material before the trial court indicates that at the relevant time Clay was sixteen years of age and had the appearance, speech and mannerism of a sixteen year old and that without inquiring or checking identification as to his age two employees of ABC sold and furnished Clay beverages which caused him to become intoxicated.
ABC argues that a "willful" sale under the statute requires more than mere neglect on the part of an employee to check the age of a customer and that it requires proof of an intentional sale or service of alcoholic beverages made with actual knowledge that the age of the person being served is under the lawful drinking age.
A "willful" sale or furnishing of alcoholic beverages to a person not of lawful drinking age does require knowledge that the recipient is not of lawful drinking age. However such inculpatory knowledge of the age of a particular person may be proved by direct evidence of actual knowledge or such knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence of such knowledge may consist of facts relating to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tuttle v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.
... ... 3d DCA 1982); Damkohler v. Damkohler, 336 So.2d 1243; Strickland v. Jacobs, 235 So.2d 747 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970), and "[t]here being no record of what evidence the ... of actual knowledge or such knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence," Willis v. Strickland, 436 So.2d 1011, 1012-13 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), review denied sub nom., ABC Liquors, ... ...
-
Sabo v. Shamrock Communications, Inc.
... ... Robert J. Jack, and Michael R. Willis, of Smalbein, Johnson, Rosier, Bussey, Rooney & Ebbets, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Peoples ... No court has required such proof for liability for minors. See, e.g., Willis v. Strickland, 436 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 446 So.2d 99 (Fla.1984); Gorman v. Albertson's, ... ...
-
Goin v. Commission on Ethics
... ... Willis v. Strickland, 436 So.2d 1011, 1012 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), petition for review denied, 446 So.2d 99 ... ...
-
Christoph v. Colorado Communications Corp.
... ... In reaching this conclusion, we are persuaded ... by the reasoning and holdings in Willis v. Strickland, 436 So.2d 1011 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983) and Sabo v. Shamrock Communications, Inc., 566 ... ...