Willow Garden Apartments, Inc. v. Riker
| Citation | 320 N.Y.S.2d 148,36 A.D.2d 892 |
| Parties | Application of WILLOW GARDEN APARTMENTS, INC., Petitioner, v. William RIKER, Chairman, and others, constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Rochester, Respondents. |
| Decision Date | 01 April 1971 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
James M. White, Rochester, for petitioner.
Charles W. Willis, Corp. Counsel, Michele DiGaetano, Rochester, for respondents.
Before MARSH, J.P., and GABRIELLI, MOULE, CARDAMONE and HENRY, JJ.
This matter properly should have been disposed of at Special Term but this court may now consider it and determine it on the merits (CPLR 7804, subd. (g); General City Law § 82, subd. 1, (c); Matter of Fasani v. Rappaport, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d 279; Matter of Circle Courts, Inc. v. Lane, 29 A.D.2d 620, 285 N.Y.S.2d 931; Matter of Rotkiewicz v. Dept. of Mental Hygiene, 283 App.Div. 458, 461, 128 N.Y.S.2d 654, 656).
Determination unanimously confirmed without costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World Christianity v. Tax Commission of City of New York
...157, 160, and see Matter of Brown v. North Syracuse Cent. School Dist., 55 A.D.2d 813, 390 N.Y.S.2d 284; Matter of Willow Gardens Apts. v. Riker, 36 A.D.2d 892, 320 N.Y.S.2d 148; Matter of Fasani v. Rappaport, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d 279; 24 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice § Although......
-
Pauling v. Smith
...Division may, and can, decide the issues without remanding to Special Term. (CPLR 7804, subd. (g); Matter of Willow Garden Apartments, Inc. v. Riker et al., 36 A.D.2d 892, 320 N.Y.S.2d 148; Matter of 125 Bar Corp. v. State Liquor Authority, 24 N.Y.2d 174, 299 N.Y.S.2d 194, 247 N.E.2d 157; M......
-
Kenyon v. Quinones
...on the merits (General City Law, § 82(1); Matter of Conklin v. Riley, 41 A.D.2d 597, 340 N.Y.S.2d 884; Matter of Willow Garden Apts., Inc. v. Riker, 36 A.D.2d 892, 320 N.Y.S.2d 148; Matter of Fasani v. Rappaport, 30 A.D.2d 588, 290 N.Y.S.2d Respondent Benedict seeks a use variance to permit......
-
Kemp v. Fossella
...Borough of Manhattan v. Board of Standards & Appeals of City of New York, 51 A.D.2d 919, 382 N.Y.S.2d 281; Matter of Willow Garden Apts. v. Riker, 36 A.D.2d 892, 320 N.Y.S.2d 148; Falkenbury v. Schultz, 44 A.D.2d 827, 355 N.Y.S.2d The denial of a use variance for the stated purpose was arbi......