Willson v. Appalachian Oak Flooring & Hardware Co.
Decision Date | 04 February 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 22761,22761 |
Citation | 140 S.E.2d 830,220 Ga. 599 |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Parties | Woodrow WILLSON v. APPALACHIAN OAK FLOORING & HARDWARE COMPANY et al. |
Syllabus by the Court
1. The petition sets forth a cause of action against the defendant as a member of a conspiracy to defraud the plaintiffs as creditors of the corporation.
2. The petition was not subject to the special demurrers on the grounds of misjoinder of parties plaintiff or defendant, nor on the ground that the petition stated separate and distinct causes of action.
Congdon & Holley, W. Barry Williams, Augusta, for plaintiff in error.
Fulcher, Fulcher, Hagler & Harper, Boller & Yow, Hull, Willingham, Towill & Norman, Harris, Chance, McCracken & Harrison, Charles G. Houston, Jr., Thurmond, Hester, Jolles & McElmurray, William C. Calhoun, Nicholson & Fleming, Augusta, for defendant in error.
To a petition seeking legal and equitable relief by several creditors of Old South Manufacturing Co., Inc., against seven individuals and one corporation, the overruling of the general and special demurrers of one defendant, Woodrow Willson, is the subject matter of review in the bill of exceptions of Willson.
The sole question is: was the petition as amended subject to the demurrers of the defendant Willson?
Appalachian Oak Flooring & Hardware Co. and six other corporations and A. W. Cordes, trading as Georgia-Carolina Manufacturing Co., and William T. Lamb et al., trading as Lamb Brothers Lumber Co., in behalf of themselves and all creditors of Old South Manufacturing Co., Inc., who might intervene, brought this action and named as defendants Woodrow Willson, six other individuals, and the American Shell Homes, Inc. It was alleged that:
The enumerated acts of the defendants were: (a) defendant Thomas and others applied to the Superior Court of Columbia County, Ga., to be incorporated under the name of 'Old South Manufacturing Co.' and the amount of the capital stock was shown to be not less than $100,000; that at the time the petition for a charter was presented neither Thomas or the other parties had obligated themselves by stock subscription to pay any part of said minimum capital stock; that on February 8, 1961 the incorporators of Old South assigned their rights to the issuance of stock to the defendants, Thomas, James D. Pratt, P. W. Pratt, Jr., and Charles H. Douglas, but these shares where never paid for and they 'began doing business under that name and style, all of them having full knowledge that no capital had been subscribed for by a valid subscription agreement under which any person was obligated to pay for stock in Old South Manufacturing Company, Inc.; and with full knowledge that the minimum capital of $100,000 had not been paid to the corporation' and ; that after February 8, 1961, but prior to June 14, 1961 'Robert R. Warr and Woodrow Wilson acquired the purported right to own capital stock in Old South Manufacturing Company, Inc. and had themselves elected directors of said company, and as such directors, they undertook with the other directors to do business under the name and style of Old South Manufacturing Company, Inc.; and that as a director of Old South Manufacturing Company, Inc., they knew there was no valid stock subscription agreement in existence under the terms of which anyone was obligated to pay for any particular number of shares of stock of Old South Manufacturing Company, Inc.; and they knew the minimum capital had not been paid in'; that on The specific acts as to the defendants Johnson and American Shell Homes, Inc. were: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ralls Corp. v. Huerfano River Wind, LLC
...152, 154 (1971). The essence of a civil-conspiracy claim is “the charge of a common design.” Willson v. Appalachian Oak Flooring & Hardware Co., 220 Ga. 599, 140 S.E.2d 830, 836 (1965). “Where several persons conspire to defraud another, one or all of the wrongdoers may be sued, and proof o......
-
Jones v. Spindel
...and defrauding the injured party the act of all. '' Grant v. Hart, 192 Ga. 153(5), 14 S.E.2d 860. See also Wilson v. Appalachian &c. Hardware Co., 220 Ga. 599, 140 S.E.2d 830. 6. A considerable portion of appellants' argument is devoted to Federal copyright law with special reference to con......
-
Zagoria v. Dubose Enterprises, Inc.
...enjoy limited liability but they will be liable individually for their own tortious or wrongful acts. Willson v. Appalachian Oak Flooring etc. Co., 220 Ga. 599, 608, 140 S.E.2d 830 (1965); Wrigley v. Nottingham, 111 Ga.App. 404, 406(1), 141 S.E.2d 859 (1965), rev'd on other grounds, 221 Ga.......
-
Super Valu Stores v. FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.
...an action. See Ga.Code Ann. § 22-601; Hill & Merry v. Jackson Stores, 137 Ga. 174, 73 S.E. 13 (1911); Willson v. Appalachian Oak Flooring & Hardware Co., 220 Ga. 599, 140 S.E.2d 830 (1965), and Coffee System of Atlanta v. Fox, 226 Ga. 593, 176 S.E.2d 71 For oral contracts to be enforceable ......